• turtlesareneat@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Remember Kodak too but it’s not their fault someone else took digital photography and actually did something with it.

  • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Back in 1995, I did “0300” work for AT&T - customer service for residential long distance customers. We used Xerox machines of some sort. I don’t remember all that many details, but it was probably a successor to the Star systems. There was a GUI and windows, although almost everything we did used terminal-type windows, connecting to various systems to look up information and make necessary changes. I do remember there was a GUI-type app for the ANI - automatic number identification - that basically gave us caller ID (number, no names) when we got a call. It didn’t always give us the number, but usually did.

    I was so young and hadn’t learned yet (with my then-undiagnosed ADHD) that phone jobs were NOT a good fit for me… I’d log in each day to customize the colours and sizes of things, which it wouldn’t save once I’d logged out. But I couldn’t stand the defaults, and also it slowed me down getting on the phones (although it counted against me and was part of the reason I lost that job - time spent outside of the queue. heh)

  • Bloefz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Well it didn’t really bring it to us because they never sold it to anyone. They could have been the top dog in computing

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Do you mean that sales were poor? If not, and you mean that literally, then they did – about 25,000 units, making it a commercial failure, but nevertheless “brought”.