Its always good to try!

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    57 minutes ago

    I have a newer Pixel phone and I’m comfortable installing and running custom ROMs from doing so regularly back in the day - for those who’ve daily driven both, what are the reasons I should NOT switch from the stock OS to GrapheneOS?

    • racoon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It was very disappointing to find out that GOS was incompatible with every phone brand but one. It is coherent with the Zeitgeist: why care about security and privacy when users will dump all their information in Google and Facebook?

    • NekuSoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Exactly. This was less important before the internet got ubiquitous, but nowadays, when manufacturers can screw you remotely, it’s very important.

      This kind of vertical integration, where a single entity controls both hardware and software shouldn’t exist.

  • pineapple@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Fairphone? perhaps. Samsung? hell naw. Samsung heavily benefits from the spyware it builds into One UI and 99% of its user base do not care about the spyware.
    But I do hope hope that Fairphone begins to embrace Linux support.

    • Preston Maness ☭@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Samsung heavily benefits from the spyware it builds into One UI and 99% of its user base do not care about the spyware.

      They go out of their way to ensure that it cannot be disabled even if you do care about the spyware and try to uninstall or disable it.

  • Big Baby Thor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    13 hours ago

    It 👏 should 👏 be 👏 the 👏 law 👏 .

    I don’t know how they managed to sneak locking a system to a single boot loader. And what about Qualcomm chips? They have a hypervisor OS, you say? A small operating system that can read all your memory? Updated as firmware?

    Great, forcibly open source that system as well and tell them once and for all that they can fuck off. No, you don’t get to control another persons property - you disgusting goblin.

    Either that, or ban the sale of such devices permanently across Europe.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Can you give me some reading on this? I am happy to make noise about an issue once I understand it.

    • viov@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 hours ago

      That too! I covered that in another of my recent posts on the Europe community on here

      That is a big thing Europe can at least make happen and in Asian/African/Latin countries too.

      I like your addition though that is all facts!! Let’s keep pushing countries to make that happen.

      To make them undo what Google is trying to do currently and what Apple does for long time to have all those devices be fully changeable for the OS

      Needs to become a movement everywhere!!! Just as StooKillingGames, and the KeepAndroidOpen movements

      We need a catchy name for it

      • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        GrapheOS doesn’t like anyone. I don’t even think they should be treated as part of open phone community. They are hostile to everything that they didn’t make.

      • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Their gripe seems more to do with eOS, but they kinda couple them together. Hardware-wise fairphone is only deficient in its security chip. I do agree with GrapheneOS in criticisms of eOS’s philosophy and security and privacy goals. The founder of eOS is a prick.

    • viov@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Sure would be the toppiest of tops!

      We can encourage them to work together in their official communication channels too!

      Would be good for both of them on every level. GrapheneOS learning to make their own phones, and Fairphone learning to make an OS while both being partnered

      Edit: Be the change you want to see everybody!! Flood the gates with what we want!

      • thomasshikari@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Graphene already has a partnership with Motorola now so the assumption is some time (I’ve seen 2027 speculated) we may get a Graphene Phone from Motorola. Mixed feelings about them partnering with a company like that but we’ll see how it goes. I still keep thinking about finally getting a secondhand pixel 10 so I can switch to Graphene from apple.

        • viov@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I would recommend it. Very worth it overall (As a user of a similar Pixel phone)

          What are your use cases?

  • BrilliantBadger@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Fairphone should focus on helping the Linux options move along, no need waste resources on GOS, just another android ROM

    Long term android should die off in place of Linux but its a long road

    Have UT running on a Nord phone, they have made good strides over the years, appreciate their dedication

  • monovergent@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Both tantalizingly close with respect to GrapheneOS. I wouldn’t expect Samsung to ever support the other two, but their phones are supposed to have every security element GOS expects. Only problem is that Samsung wants to make their own walled-garden ecosystem a la Apple.

    I do remember reading somewhere that GrapheneOS are open to someone making a GSI (generic system image) port that would work with phones like Fairphone, which GOS don’t want to officially support due to a lack of security features. I wonder if anyone has started work on such a thing.

  • apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    The short term is forked android. The long term is a Linux distribution, new or otherwise. It doesn’t seem reasonable to assume that the proprietary blobs in Android will get reverse engineered.

    • viov@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      That will definitely be the focus. If Europe people can mandate making Android and Apple Ecosystems be opened to having real GNU/Linux or anything else they want to be able to be put on it then that would make huge changes to getting that to happen

    • HyperfocusSurfer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      Русский
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      These fuckers don’t let you unlock the bootloader, so they can burn for all I care. So far, google have the best record, then oneplus, fairphone and alike (easy to unlock the bootloader, no point or ability to relock with custom keys), then mb xiaomi (beg corporate overlords for the ability to unlock the bootloader on YOUR FUCKING PHONE) and slmsung (loose the option to unlock the bootloader on newer firmware versions, loose security features on older ones), and then huawei/crapple who don’t let you unlock the bootloader at all

        • HyperfocusSurfer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          Русский
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Idk, honestly. On one hand, they’re on the clear path to enshitify android into a wannabe walled garden. On the other hand, the bootloader is still unlockable and relockable, and I personally liked what they did with pixel 10 in terms of repair ability