Transphobic comments

Intentionally silencing the truth

  • CameronDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Lol, if we start excluding tech based on the inventors mental illnesses we are gonna end up bashing rocks together to make fire.

    Edit: To be clear, I am not saying that being trans is a mental illness, only refuting that mental illness is not a reason to discard ones contributions. Apologies for any offence.

    • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      It’s so easy to be called *phobic these days. It reminds of those relationships in which people feel like they are walking on eggshells.

    • V ‎ ‎ @beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Pretty much lol. RMS went off the deep end so no GNU, Torvalds used to call people devil cunts so no Linux kernel. Theo probably did something to upset somebody lol. Maybe we can just use TempleOS and become computing hermits?

      • CameronDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        10 months ago

        Goes back further than that, Turing was gay, so anything building off his works must also be transitively gay.

        To add to the modern examples, Reiser murdered his wife, which really puts “devil cunts” into perspective :D

        • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          10 months ago

          Goes back another 100 years before that. Lovelace was a woman, who in her time wasn’t supposed to be doing anything at all

          • Lilium@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            Back then people still believed in the “woman hysteria” thing, right? Ngl sounds very “mental illness” to me.

      • aperson@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Well, using the same metrics would mean TempleOS is waaaaay out of the question.

      • The Doctor@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        OpenBSD got a grant from the DoD, and then Theo posted his opinions of the post-9/11 US government, and they put a stop on the check before it even crossed the border. He pissed a lot of folks inside the Beltway off that day.

      • aname@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        Except all our hardware is made by major corporationw and there are no major corporations that work totally ethically and morally

      • CameronDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        The original post called it a mental illness, i was following that. Apologies if I caused offence it was not intended.

          • CameronDev@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            The original post referred to it as a mental illness, and claimed that was a reason to ignore their contribution. I was simply pointing out the silliness of that logic. I dont think its a mental illness, amd I have absolutely no problem with the trans community.

            • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              was simply pointing out the silliness of that logic

              There are many, many ways you could have done that without repeating the bigoted belief that being trans is supposedly a mental illness.

              • CameronDev@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                10 months ago

                I didnt say anything about trans people in my original comment, and deliberately didnt quote the original post as its language disgusts me. Again, sorry for any offence caused, it was not intentional.

                • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  I didnt say anything about trans people in my original comment and deliberately didnt quote the original post as its language disgusts me

                  So why did you repeat the “mental illness” part?

                  If you really mean what you’re saying just take the L this one time and move on.

      • FaeDrifter@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Being trans is not a mental illness but let’s not encourage stigma around mental illness either.

        Cis people with mental illness are valid

        Trans people with mental illness are valid

        Mentally healthy trans people are valid

        Mentally healthy cis people are valid

        • metallic_z3r0@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I mean, being trans is perfectly valid, but I think gender dysphoria itself should be classified as a mental illness so long as it brings significant pain/distress to the individual, the solution there is just gender reassignment, surgery, hormones, etc. I don’t think there should be stigma in calling it such, it needs treatment the same as anything else. People with ADHD have a mental illness and get meds, sometimes therapy, people with poor eyesight have an ocular dysfunction of some kind and get glasses or surgery or whatever, none of it should be that big a deal. The point is it can be diagnosed and treated.

          I think the response to shit like “transgenderism” being a mental disease should be “well at least their/our dysphoria can be treated now, what’s your excuse?”

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Unsurprising. I’ve seen a fair amount of people in the Linux community like this.

    It’s also quite hilarious to see them frothing at the mouth so much over Gnome getting some money to aid in accessibility improvements lol. Can’t be having the less abled using computers now, can we?

    • socsa@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Wait until FOSS nerds learn that the NSA and DoD are some of the top upstream contributors to FOSS projects.

  • long_chicken_boat@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m actually pro LGTB and hate Wayland. Don’t make us all look as conservative scumbags. Some of use just hate Red Hat (IBM) because of their big corp nature.

      • PowerSeries@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Careful you don’t come off as a sealion.

        Though this is a thread about Wayland so eh.

        • clearleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          This comic never made sense to me. She hates sea lions because they don’t let people talk shit about them. Seems like she’s the problem here in neo london where sapient sea lions live among us. They’re here, get over it.

          • Kindness@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            because they don’t let people talk shit about them

            The manner in which you engage in dialogue is important.

            Pretending to not understand another person’s viewpoint, and annoying them into compliance, is arguing in bad faith. Arguments in bad faith are malicious deception.

            Nobody wants to speak with sea lions because even if you explain in good faith, it won’t amount to anything except your own frustration. A summary of the heart of the sea lion: Arguing with me is pointless. “And now that you’re mad, you’ll know better than to talk shit about sea lions.”

            Don’t be a sea lion. You can protest opinions without being manipulative or rude about it.

            • Communist@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 months ago

              …do you actually think the sea lion understands why people hate sea lions?

              None of this is in the comic.

              • Kindness@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                They must, by definition. So yes. But for the sake of illustration, let’s assume someone who acts like a sea lion isn’t arguing in bad faith, but they aren’t arguing in good faith either. Whether they and unintentionally annoying, or not, ultimately makes no difference to the people around them.

                Let’s say a specific oblivious person is combative and persistent. They are not truly trying to understand something, they just want to be right. You try to explain why their responses could be considered rude and prompt self reflection.

                A) Will they evaluate themselves and realize what they are doing? B) Will they argue because they insist on being right?

                The former is a rude person, but they are someone trying to figure out the world. Whether you engage with them or not, eventually they will realize their actions are causing disengagement. We’re all trying to learn and become better versions of ourselves. This person made some mistakes, realizes it, then changes.

                There is no point in engaging the latter. Their lack of self awareness is irrelevant to the outcome and your mental state. Leave them alone, and don’t respond. If you do respond, and they realize they are wrong, but continue: they become a sea-lion if the fake politeness, and troll if they become inflammatory.

                Don’t feed the trolls. If they want to, “be right,” they can be alone in thinking they’re right, and you can get back to learning and bettering yourself.

                None of this is in the comic.

                No satirical comic literally explains the intent of the comic; intent must be inferred based on the events it depicts. Or you can search the internet, Know Your Meme attempts to track culture and context. Yay for them.

                • Communist@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Ah, I see, i didn’t realize sea lioning was an established term before that.

        • Communist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m absolutely team sea-lion here, did you read that comic?

          I mean, just imagine if the sea-lion was a black person…

        • Kindness@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          The point of the sea lion is persistent argument in bad faith.

          The difference between, “prove your opinion,” can be subtle in its difference from, “why do you think that?”

          Insinuating someone is badgering and being maliciously dishonest, because they asked for context, is poor etiquette.

      • interceder270@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Damn, imagine having to answer this question every time you say you don’t like something.

        Something tells me you don’t ask this when people say they hate X.

        • RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          By x you mean twitter? Maybe because its very clear and visible why its shit.

          With Wayland, not so much. I don’t see any issues with it either, so by asking someone who hates it, why. Maybe that person will mention something i didn’t know yet and see their perspective.

        • Communist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I mean yeah, it’s obvious why X/twitter is shit, everyone has the exact same opinion about this.

          Why would I ask about that when the answer is obvious? And why would I not ask when the answer isn’t obvious?

            • Communist@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              There’s also plenty of obvious reasons to hate the X windowing system. Like that it’s unmaintained and going the way of the dodo. Plus learning about a system that is old is less interesting than something that is new. I don’t care about the ways a dead, unmaintained system sucks, so why would I ask?

  • Krause [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Wayland fixes VRR, mixed refresh rate display setups, screen tearing, X11 security bugs AND makes bigots mad? Sign me up! :-)

  • Bloody Harry@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    [Completely unrelated to the content] How the heck is this post managing to crash two out of my three lemmy clients?

  • tetris11@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I remember back when I thought all FOSS was part of the FSF, and that itself was formed of hippie liberal progressives. Had a rude awakening when I found about the MIT vs GPL rift, and then another on HN when I realised half the people in software were just there to make money.

    • pixelscript@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      I had a period where I didn’t really understand the GPL or what it was trying to do. All I knew is that it was ““viral”” (whatever the hell that meant!) and that, supposedly, trying to use it would forever bind you and your creation to who knows what unforeseen legal horrors. I mean, look how long it is! It’s frightening! I wanted absolutely nothing to do with it at first.

      Then I got a clue and actually read it. It’s quite straightforward. For almost all serves and purposes it’s basically just MIT plus copyleft. All the legal density is just an effort to squash every conceivable loophole to the copyleft directive. I’m no longer afraid of it, I think it’s pretty cool.

      The thing I want to know now is why so many projects think their shit don’t stink and that they need to pollute the FOSS ecosystem with their own stupid permissive license that is functionally identical to the MIT license.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Could be they like the idea of being in control of the license or something like that

        • The Doctor@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Could also have to do with running a gauntlet of lawyers to be allowed to open some code you wrote.

  • moonsnotreal@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Holy shit that is bad. I don’t use wayland, but that’s only because it freezes randomly on my 1650. (It’s probably bc it’s on an optimus laptop). I hope this person gets their github account banned.

  • Hazel@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    I only read the first comment and the use of a slur and deep transphobic talking points made me stop reading the rest.

    As a trans woman myself… thanks for all this non transphobia in this comment thread <333

    • WoefKat@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Well I hate GNOME personally but it’s just because of its philosophy: Opinionated software. They prefer removing choice and forcing users to “use it as it was meant to be used”. I don’t like that because I have my own opinions and I want my software to adjust to me instead of me adjusting to the software. Other people are more inclined to really embracing a product and its methodology but I don’t work that way. But hating software is not the same as hating people. Software is just a ‘thing’.

      I moved away from Mac too because it moved ever more in that direction: Removing choice. But I don’t hate GNOME developers or users <3 Just the product. I use KDE instead and am very happy with it. And I don’t care if anyone hates KDE, that’s their choice. Not every product is for everyone and that is OK.

      I also don’t like Systemd but I don’t use it either. So it’s fine, they can do what they want and I do what I want. I’m not a team player and not loyal to anyone or anything, just my own opinions.

      But I don’t really understand what all this has to do with LGBTIQ+ (which I’m very much in favour of)

      • Patch@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        Well I hate GNOME personally but it’s just because…

        I think there’s a big difference between having software preferences (even very strong ones) and making the hate of something a personal crusade.

        I like GNOME and I don’t really like KDE. But I absolutely, categorically don’t hate KDE; it’s a big project with a lot of high quality contributors and a lot of very happy users. I just don’t really enjoy the design.

        I don’t like Mac, but I don’t hate Mac. I really don’t like Windows, but I’m still able to recognise it for the engineering feat that it is. The world is full of things that aren’t my personal favourite, but none of them have done anything to me to elicit genuine hatred.

        Wayland, GNOME, systemd and snaps seem to be the unholy quadfecta of obsessive hate in Linux land these days. People seem to practically set their own personal identity against their feelings on these technology stacks. If you don’t like them, just don’t use them…

        • WoefKat@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Wayland, GNOME, systemd and snaps seem to be the unholy quadfecta of obsessive hate in Linux land these days. People seem to practically set their own personal identity against their feelings on these technology stacks. If you don’t like them, just don’t use them…

          I agree, but the problem and the reason for my resentment is that some of these are forced on us. Gnome even introduced some dependencies on systemd. Poettering was even quoted as saying that was a good thing because it forced people to adopt systemd quicker. Of course he is a pretty blunt person which doesn’t help liking the stuff he makes. But the backing of IBM/RedHat allows him to get his stuff adopted. For me he is definitely one of the reasons I don’t want systemd.

          Snapd can’t be ignored in modern Ubuntu because even an apt-get forces a snap install for some packages. This is the problem for me. I have to keep finding ever more obscure distros to avoid the things I don’t like (and in the end I moved to FreeBSD). Even Arch the most configurable distro of all (you can choose pretty much everything from network stack, partition format, etc) forces you to use systemd now.

          This is what powers my anger towards them. And Mac I hate because I feel a bit betrayed by Apple, first making a powerful Unix-like OS with decent GUI which I liked, and them making it more and more mainstream and locked-down like their iOS toys, removing power features and locking many features into their walled iCloud garden. Also reducing options to upgrade Macs, introducing terrible keyboards etc. I used them for years but in the end was forced to leave the platform. It’s a bit like an ex-smoker hating smokers I guess because it reminds them of the misery they dealt with :)

          About Wayland: We are constantly bombarded with propaganda that X11 is deprecated and end of life. Even by its maintainers (RedHat as wayland maintainer chose to take over X11 maintenance so they could let it die more easily). This is what I hate. I’m perfectly happy if I can keep using X11. But this is constantly cast into doubt by all this skullduggery. Luckily FreeBSD is much less prone to chasing the new feature on the block than Linux is though.

          Where my hate comes from is being forced to adopt something I don’t want to (or people trying to do so). If they would have just made things optional, I would have had zero problems with it. This is why I don’t hate GNOME, I don’t like it at all but it’s fine because whatever distro I choose I can always choose not to use it. I don’t really hate Windows either, in fact I even use it for gaming. But what does make me hate something is having something good and then being forced to see it change into something worse. It’s reactive to this behaviour.

    • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Good job reinforcing the stereotype that transgender people are violent and mentally unstable.

      • FoundTheVegan@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        How dare you be upset when you are insulted!

        🙄

        Really? Jokes about steam roller counts as violence? Those Looney Toon be a real scary show for ya? Wild they make it for kids.

        Shame on you. Feign your mock outrage and cry those crocodile tears, for the rest of us are laughing at the sad transparency.

        • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          In what world is driving a steamroller over someone not violent? How would you like it if someone made a meme about driving a steamroller over transgender people?

              • FoundTheVegan@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                10 months ago

                Because it’s a very silly question, one that I’m not going to entertain because…

                Do you really think this person is out renting a steam roller? And trying to find the street address of that person now?!

                You are steching so hard to call this a violent threat when it could not be more silly. You’re not motivated by “preventing violence”, because the entire premise here is ridiculous at face value. You’re motivated by wanting to call trans people unstable.

                Go tell your friends, your boss, your family you stopped someone from getting killed by a steam roller by saying “tut tut, ur crazy” on the internet. You know damn well they are gonna laugh at you.

                • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  So I presume if someone posted a comment saying “I’d love to roll him over with a steamroller” under a post about a transgender person, you would not consider that a violent threat because they are not going to actually get a steamroller?

  • IverCoder@lemm.eeOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Sorry for the Windows emojis lol, I’m on a computer shop as I post this on lunch break

  • Emily (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Ah, the James Damore archetype of an engineer. I bet they get wet dreams imagining themselves as the Howard Roark of programming (and just as delusional).