Chrome users are likely not readers of privacy blogs. So ‘fury’ sounds like a strong word considering those same users are blissfully unawares and there is no comment in the article from google or their intention to respond to the reported abuse
Clickbait headline.
"fury and “sneakily” are loaded terms. You can find a furious person on any topic on social media and “sneakily” is nonsense, they were trying to delete a file that Chrome requires and so Chrome fixes the install when it runs.
They even note that you can disable it in settings, though not without making it sound like an unusually hard thing to do: “manually digging through setting”
Clickbait headline, ragebait article. Anything for some advertising dollars.
I agree it’s a hyperbolic headline and article; more of an opinion piece than news. It’s subjective but I think I would describe it as “sneaky” to add a 4gb AI component to a browser. The AI features were added as a default feature, opt-outs were only added later, and the users are not asked for permission before the download of the 4gb file to support the AI service. This doesn’t benefit users; it benefits Google in it’s quest to try to dominate the AI space by pushing it’s own AI features and integrations.
Just to be clear from the start, I don’t use Chrome (or any Google products or services) and recommend everyone switch to Firefox/Firefox forks which are more privacy friendly.
I completely agree that it should be opt-in as well.
It’s subjective but I think I would describe it as “sneaky” to add a 4gb AI component to a browser.
Google CONSTANTLY adds and removes default features from Chrome without any user notice (outside of patch notes) and many without the ability to opt out (Manifest v3, for example). Most people simply don’t care to pay attention to the patch notes, which is understandable.
But, this specific AI thing isn’t one of them.
Like you said, this is Google attempting to dominate the AI space my pushing it’s own AI features and integrations.
This means a lot of self-promotion
They have a blog post:
https://blog.google/products-and-platforms/products/search/ai-mode-chrome/
An announcement video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56b9uHAcHYc
Developer documentation:
https://developer.chrome.com/docs/ai/built-in
A product page:
https://gemini.google/overview/gemini-in-chrome/
(There’s also YT advertisements and text ads, which I’ve seen on work PCs but I have them blocked at home so I have no links to examples)
The article, and many other articles sharing the same framing, are simply cashing in on outrage by ragebaiting the anti-AI crowd. Google has been loudly promoting their AI services and integration in all of their products. It is not at all surprising that Chrome is included in that and Google has made every attempt to tell every person on Earth that this is the case.
They should be put onto privacy blogs so they understand its fucked and use way better options
Why did they use a screenshot of Chrome from, like, Win XP times?
Google is mask off now. It’s 100% a spyware company and jn AmeriKKKan crapitalism, caveat emptor.
Don’t know what the big deal is.
There must be tens of thousands of Furries erupting every day.Heh, take my upvote.
TL;DR:
- Chrome downloads a 4GB AI model without any user-facing option to disable this behaviour.
- Use another browser to avoid this, e.g. a Firefox employee stated that the AI kill-switch will completely stop such features in Firefox (Source: Techlore Talks). Other alternatives are Brave, Vivaldi, Waterfox and many more. Choose what fits your needs.
Brave is a series scam company.
What fury? I see mild reactions.
Blatantly illegal, everyone shrugs.
wishing it was illegal is slightly different from it actually being illegal
The least they could’ve done is install one of the abliterated models, so people can see how badly Gemini censors them…
For those that’ll go search that later, you’re welcome.
You chose chrome. It’s on you.
Brother, it was installed on my device without my consent :|
I get you
You can still just stop using it and move to Firefox at least. However I understand you might have device restrictions for installing new programs if it’s not your own device.
If the AI model runs locally and doesn’t spy on you, sure. Users should be asked before such a thing is installed and many old computers will choke hard at running this shit too. Google chrome is gonna take up a lot more ram too.
