• anyhow2503@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Icons on the desktop is a non-feature for most gnome users. Even my Windows desktop has been empty since XP released. If you really want desktop icons then using an extension for that should be fine, but it’s silly to frame this as a failing of the “Gnome people” just because Gnome doesn’t replicate the classic Windows desktop experience.

    • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Icons on the desktop is a non-feature for most gnome users

      Yeah because everyone who uses them is on KDE now.

      • anyhow2503@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Probably, yeah? I mean I’d hope they’re not still using Gnome if desktop icons are their one wish in life…

    • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I have icons on my desktop, icons in my taskbar, and of course the menu. taskbar, always there, one click, boom! second tier apps, desktop, less used stuff, open menu.

      I use KDE BTW

      • anyhow2503@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Whatever floats your boat. I’m using my keyboard probably 90% of the time and hitting super and typing in one to three letters followed by enter is the fastest way for me to navigate to pretty much anything including system settings and documents. Finding stuff on a desktop with more than a dozen icons is annoying to me. I move windows and switch focus with the standard keyboard shortcuts etc. It’s a familiar workflow for tiling WM users and works that way out of the box, yet Gnome has been catching shit for it since v3. It used to be the disgruntled Gnome 2 userbase but nowadays it seems to be mostly people who don’t use Gnome at all lol.