• some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Oh, cool! Red Hat! The people who run a company charging for support. This makes me feel very safe.

    Ever since the ssh thing, but especially in the last few months, I really don’t feel safe with anything on the internet.

    • badmin@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Dare I ask, what ssh thing?


      Side Note: It was already believed that SSH encryption was broken by state actors since the first NSA leaks. So, people should at least always use it over another encrypted channel anyway.

  • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    I can’t decide if this is real or an advertisement for the linked article service. I don’t see any CVE in the article which seems to be a good indication of the quality of the content.

    I’m not saying that this is misinformation, but I’m extremely sceptical about the nature of this article.

    • Redhat employee had leaked credentials, threat actor used those credentials to push some files to GitHub, which executed the code in a GitHub action which had trusted access to publish to NPM.

      Essentially, an employee got owned and someone used their access (that they already had) to publish the nefarious code.

      You’ll see GitHub Actions in these often, as that’s how a lot of big open source organizations publish their packages and run tests/deployments. It’s less of a “GitHub based problem” and more of a “trust boundary problem”, if they used other services, the same problem could likely have still been successful.