• kablez@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    4 months ago

    My non Linux savvy spouse is currently dual booting Linux Mint because Windows has become so frustrating to use.

    Mint isn’t perfect. We’ve run into a few bugs and shortcomings. But there’s a big difference between dealing with genuine issues in an OS and using one that feels actively hostile and designed to exploit the user.

    If both experiences can be frustrating, why choose the one that’s frustrating by design (unless you absolutely have to) ?

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      I’ve used Linux for a decade now and windows is so much more buggy and shortcoming. Including new bugs.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 months ago

    If they want people addicted to an AI, it’s going to have to be a lot better than fucking Copilot.

    As slop generators go, it’s about the sloppiest.

  • BigMacHole@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 months ago

    We’re going to MAKE people ADDICTED by making a REALLY Good Product! SOLVING annoying Problems! TREATING Customers respectfully! FORCING ourselves Onto people like Donald Trump on Little Girls!

  • it_depends_man@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    Duh. I wouldn’t have called it “addiction”, but dependency was clearly the goal, otherwise they wouldn’t take away classical search.

    I thought that was obvious from the start.

  • Aneorthisio@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    Create a captive audience through monopoly or near monopoly on a given market, then charge them more for a worse version of the product, reducing costs and maximizing profits, it’s always been the goal with corporate capitalism, look at the whole Copilot and GitHub situation right now.

  • Kaligalis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    No shit, Sherlock.
    And people would actually happily get addicted to an AI assistant which is reliable, safe, capable, kind, and fast.
    They really should try making a great product. Then they don’t need any tricks. People love great products.

    • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      And local and under your control. As a “second brain” that isn’t sentient but intelligent to assist you AI has great potential. In a few years we’ll probably have the models and new hardware to run good enough models locally on cheap enough hardware.

      But by then they’ll have drummed enough support for “muh copyright” to buy legislation for AI licensing and make all AI models have to pay a license fee to… “someone”. Like that poor writer who had his work illegally read by an AI. So then no open source models can exist and they have the monopoly. Big win for the little guy lol.

      • Kaligalis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        The answer to “copyright” overreach is just piracy. I can play pirated games, watch pirated movies, listen to pirated music… Of course, I will be able to just use a pirated model locally. Or I can just use a Chinese or Russian one - they can speak English just fine.

  • Solrac@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    Oh they’re making me addicted alright. I can’t stop installing Linux on things. Its like a new vice for my devices

  • Q'z@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    At least they’re honest (internally) about their intentions. Obviously this is also the goal of the other big AI foundries; it either already is or it will be in the future.

    Luckily Microsoft is famously bad at this, but Google and perhaps OpenAI will be more successful. We’re still in the subsidized honeymoon phase, but this window is closing with the increasing pressure to return profit.

    As a skeptic, I’m not worried about myself, but I’m scared for the people who will get addicted and then ruined by full prices or devastated when their mind drug is taken away again.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      seems like google and OPENAI have the same problems, just as a slower decline. google trying to force gemini into all thier services. anthropoic isnt doing any better either.

      • Q'z@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Agreed, but I give Google a better chance with Google, Android & Gemini to actualy make an “addicting” chatbot.