• Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    4 months ago

    The battery law is “so broad and so restrictive that it prevents the sale of this wonderful, jointly developed, U.S.-European product from being sold in the European Union…”

    No. Meta chose to design e-waste.

    • benjirenji@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      4 months ago

      People most worry about the hidden cameras and being filmed without noticing and consent. The tech being open wouldn’t change that, even though I agree that an open platform would be awesome.

    • melfie@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      I suppose all tech is pretty much like this. Controlled by the people, it’s great. Controlled by the oligarchs, it’s shitty and oppressive.

  • TheDuke@europe.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    This is good, but it’s already out of control. If you walk past a parked Tesla, just for example, you’ll be filmed. If you walk past any public building, you’ll be filmed. Public place? Damn right, filmed. As soon as you step out of your house, you’re recorded. And despite all the promises made, I bet much more data lands on some obscure server farms or AI Data centers, than they exclaim.

    • melfie@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is the digital cage and the reason 3,000+ data centers are being built. I think we are headed towards a historically unprecedented level of surveillance where nobody can do or say anything without the Epstein class being alerted.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Hypothetical question: if I invented glasses that told me when people were lying, would they be accepted or would there be an angry uprising to ban them?

    edit: reminder - clicking an arrow is not an answer, it means you don’t have one.

    edit: why the douchevotes and silence on this? The only responder just deflected the question. It seems to me that taking lying out of human interaction would be a plus. Isn’t the idea at least interesting?

      • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        A question about banning tech that invades privacy is irrelevant in a thread about banning tech that invades privacy? Okay, fair enough - I’ll move it to Ask Lemmy, where it might not hit at many hot buttons.

    • CovertOperative@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Isn’t the idea at least interesting?

      Sure, if you’re asking what to write in your next fantasy novel. This topic is about reality.