• Remy Rose@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    21 days ago

    It “blocks” social media? Whether or not you actually want that, I’m not sure how they could possibly implement it in a way that isn’t terrible. Jolla is outside my wheelhouse, but it’s Linux isn’t it? How are they stopping me from installing anything, let alone these specific things?

  • Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    Good idea, it depends on the implementation though - sometimes having a browser on demand is important.

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      How do you think people managed before smart phones?

      Nothing’s that important it can’t wait to get home or to a library, or call someone and get them to check if it is THAT important .

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        I’m not saying it’s unmanageable, I’m saying it’s useful to have one.

        A web browser is not the problem in most people’s cases, social media is. The point of a dumb smartphone is to keep all the useful tools while banning the harmful ones.

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          21 days ago

          No, if people can receive emails, it defeats the entire purpose. Just don’t install those apps then? Lol. A browser allows access to most social media anyways, so providing one is counter to its purpose.

          • Pennomi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 days ago

            Strongly disagree. Email is foundational communication just like text messaging.

            Social media is NOT foundational communication.

            • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              21 days ago

              And an email can wait until you get home, if it’s that important, call, but texts suffice.

              A browser allows access to social media, so now you just lost the phones sole purpose, good job.

  • printf("%s", name);@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 days ago

    If it’s customizable enough to allow users to remove any and all unwanted user and system apps - through ADB or otherwise - I’m all in. But if I’m stuck with a $500 phone with unremovable Big Tech affiliated apps, it goes into the trash can.

    Also, in my country, electronic identification is a must have, so I hope that works too…

  • SamuelEllis@lemmy.worldBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    While removing Google services reduces a specific attack surface, the device still relies on a proprietary OS that introduces its own telemetry and fingerprinting vectors. It is worth questioning whether this hardware approach truly addresses the root cause of doomscrolling compared to enforcing strict usage limits on existing, auditable platforms.