• teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        I would expect to pay $50 for a modern flip phone with hardware comparable to one from 20y ago. But this is running Sailfish OS, has a decent SoC, camera, DAC, and up to 64GB of RAM. This ain’t your grandma’s flip phone.

        • operationalHazard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 days ago

          Not sure if it’s me or you misreading this, but I believe when it says 4GB/64GB it’s one model, 4GB of RAM and 64GB internal storage. 64GB of RAM at a form factor to fit in a phone that small is currently outwith our technological capacity surely

          • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 days ago

            Ah yeah, I misread that. I agree $500 is high for what it is, but it’s also kind of a novelty device that they’ll surely only make a relatively small number of to guage interest. The industry has shifted all of its manufacturing away from making flip phones cheap.

  • willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    Look, I love the idea of a Linux phone.

    But $500 and it manages my temptations for me? Fuck no.

    The whole point of Linux is freedom.

    Enough behavior shaping.

    • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      21 days ago

      Social media is humans being social through media, I am sick and tired of it being categorically villainized especially because the scientific evidence for it being inherently bad is laughable.

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        21 days ago

        No browser is wild. And what does that even mean here? You have to run everything by app now? That sounds like ass.

        What is the point of it being linux if it just runs “99% of android apps” but no browser?

  • Stupendous@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    21 days ago

    It’s like that era of putting pink ribbons on everything for breast cancer that also signaled you were a supporter of women. Commercialized activism. Be real. This will sell very little. We’ll get some news articles about how it’s trending with Gen z that are rejecting technology and always online culture. It’ll actually only be a small amount of Gen z but you know blogspam going to blogspam.

    It’s a crappy product. We need a Linux phone that would actually be a halo product for people to not feel like they’re ripping themselves off to get away from Google and Apple

  • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    21 days ago

    My first thought was, this might be about just what’s installed by default. Reading a bit further the article says:

    Apparently, the OS has hard blocks to stop the installation of browsers and social media apps.

    “Users are still able to sideload apps outside those that are blocked, using APK installer files…”

    So I’m not sure why I would want pay 500 Dollars / Euros, just so they have control over what I can install and not. To me this would be a deal breaker. Also this seems to be “basically a custom version of the Jolla Sailfish OS”, so there are probably “better” options using the same OS. And it only has 4GB of RAM? I am not impressed for the price and for the control.

  • placebo@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    I get the idea of dumb phones, but $500 (or with taxes in Europe at least 600 EUR) for a phone that cannot even run a browser? This is ridiculous.

  • Geodes & Gems@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    20 days ago

    That’s a stupid price, one of the main things of brick/flip phones is their low price, HMD feature phones range from about £20 to £70, some new google pixels can go for about this price, so getting something with the price of a smartphone with a fraction of the features sounds scummy.

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    20 days ago

    Who is going to pay $500 for a retro flip phone, when you can get a second-hand iPhone for half that? Or you know, an actual flip phone for $25.

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    21 days ago

    So happy with my 2nd hand Pixel 8. No BS, ecologically acceptable IMHO and yes runs most Android apps thanks to GrapheneOS.

  • GMac@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    20 days ago

    Whatsapp preinstalled… hard pass from me. All the other considerations like price, browser block, app emulation implementation; those are all things I could probably get past but preinstalled spyware is unacceptable from the get go.

    Edit to add. The app blocking is interesting to me. Instead of thinking about the user being blocked from unstalling and using the app, I’m curious about the technology they will use to block the app (and app maker) from running activity on the device.

    Hopefully the solution includes something like DNS blocking rather than a blacklist on the play integrity api and a reliance on Google killing the unstall of apk from other sources.

    Not sure if DNS blocking explains the browser exclusion which is otherwise a bit odd.

    • plutopos@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 days ago

      This phone is probably aimed at countries where Whatsapp is legit mandatory if you want a social life and a job (e.g. much of Europe and South America)

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    21 days ago

    At $200… Maybe.

    AI slop video, no faith in what will (or likely won’t) be delivered.

    • ranzispa@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      I can get a new modern smartphone which works without major problems at $80. I see no reason to spend double that on a flip phone.

      • Snapz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Is that phone truly Linux based, have expandable memory, a temeable battery, etc… and does it have a team actively supporting it to maintain and expand those features? I’m saying I’d pay $200 for what they were describing IF real people were building a movement away from the same black apple/samsung rectangles, locked into deep Google surveillance fed back to palantir.

  • BartyDeCanter@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    21 days ago

    While it seems like everyone here hates it, I’ve been looking for a minimal phone for when my current one dies. This seems to hit the exact sweet spot of functionality I want vs what I don’t want. As for the price, well, I’m spending at least that much on my next phone anyway so it seems fine by me.

    And I have a huge nostalgia for flip phones and transparent electronics. So yeah, signed up to preorder.

    • uuj8za@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 days ago

      Nice! I’m very tempted… I really like that it’s SailfishOS. I bought an Xperia 10 III with SailfishOS and it works pretty decently. I’ve used the Android compatibility layer, it’s pretty good.

      I know it’s not 100% FOSS, but maybe it’s seeming like we could rally around SailfishOS for an alternative to Android and iOS.