Bit of a click baity title lol. If there’s one good use of AI, its probably accessibility.
The framework split things into two groups, implicit AI that quietly improves what you already use and explicit AI that are features you’d actually summon on purpose.
The very first paragraph already upsets me. Have in mind, I would criticize this on every other operating system too. I believe no one should use Ai tools that act autonomously in the background, to improve or change what you already use. It should always be a “summon on purpose”.
I’ll just leave this here… https://debian.org/
Well fuck you too Canonical.
Out of curiosity would it be accurate to call this sort of technology generative ai, or just machine learning? Or it depends on the implementation?
I feel like most of the anger around ai is because gen ai has a bunch of harmful baggage, and I’m curious if this is an example of gen ai having a productive use case, or an example of ai being more useful outside of gen ai specifically
Based on their explanation, this is still using genAI. They talk about pre-processing the data and chunking it before it’s sent to the inference model.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHepKd38pr0
One more step towards the discovery of what androids dream about.
Canonical can take its AI and walk into the sea
