• Cherry@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      Welcome to the Resistance. Simple steps like this are the right response.

      TBH I think I’m at the rebellious point of do it without it bumping into me. Steal it’s cargo and dump it somewhere.

      • meco03211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        17 days ago

        Saw a video of one of these things at an intersection asking a pedestrian to hit the walk button for it. He just laughed and said nope. I bet a real person could hit the button.

        • Cherry@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          17 days ago

          The thing is it it was an overall fair system most people would get along with the machines. But capitalists and ‘leaders’ have started to make us hate it.

          • Cherry@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            17 days ago

            These must be pretty haltable tbh. Either by covering the lidar and I am guessing there will be a safety stop button somewhere. What happens then can the be force rebooted?

            And how do they cross the road can the be fooled? Are they crossing after a sound occurs or is it a can see them being gps.

            It’s gonna take bunches of us rounding them up like sheep and hearding them towards a locked field.

          • lorty@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            17 days ago

            Why would I have to share the already limited walking paths with these robots in a fair system?

    • teft@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 days ago

      They seem portable enough to lug to a river which is exactly where it would go if one hit me or anyone i was with.

  • Flying_Lynx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    17 days ago

    “broken-down robots causing obstructions”

    It’s littering. Call the sanitation department.

  • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    17 days ago

    This is just one of many, many pieces of technology that have been just put into public from tech companies whether we like it or now. And they do it because they know there is no regulation, nor will there be anytime soon to reign it in.

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    17 days ago

    To be fair, the delivery robots I’ve seen (made by Yandex, which is known for bleeding-edge developments in self-driving technology) made good job to be as unobtrusive and predictable as possible, while also avoiding humans in quite a large range.

    My only issue with them is that these are camera-equipped devices rolling the streets and likely sending all that footage to their Big Tech daddies. Besides that, they do their job well, reducing the need for hard human labor.

      • heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 days ago

        I’m surprised that those who lost the work aren’t administers or some beneficiary of it. UBI seems to be the way??

      • Allero@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        Eliminating terrible jobs may come with new, somewhat less crushing ones.

        The reality of the labor market on its lower end is that plenty of jobs are unnecessary and artificial. They are meant to generate employment while not reducing working hours or (re-)educating people to take jobs that are actually in demand. It is a simple band-aid, that is easy for the government and good for capital (as it gets both incentives from the government and a pass on building a gig economy).

        The more terrible, crushing jobs we eliminate, the more the government is forced to actually do something meaningful about the labor.

        • k0e3@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          Delivering food is hardly what I’d consider “terrible.” Delivering food for big tech companies who see you as expendable trash is though. The only reason why these robots are being made is not to make the delivery people’s lives easier; it’s to pay them even less.

        • placebo@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          17 days ago

          Delivering food and other items from online stores is hardly terrible or crushing. That would be working at a slaughterhouse or gathering berries under a scorching sun. Delivery isn’t as cozy as sitting in a nice, warm office, but a lot of students do it because it’s accessible and pays their bills.

          • Allero@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 days ago

            There’s not one, but plenty of terrible jobs.

            I’ve been at the slaughterhouse, and it is indeed one of the most horrific experiences I had. The smell of stale blood, the heat, the constant repetition, and normalized violence. It takes a mental toll.

            And working in delivery (which I also did) takes a physical one - especially when you’re a walking courier, which these things are aimed to replace. Back problems, damaged feet, severe calluses, chafing, muscle pain, high risk of all sorts of traumas…the list goes on. Add to that that the rates paid often force these people to overwork way past their healthy physical limits, and you get a recipe for disaster.

            Students choose it, because they need an unqualified job that can adapt to their study schedule. Gig work does that. But the rest is pure exploitation, which finds its reflection in health issues, lack of time and fulfillment, and, in case of students - a fall in academic performance.

  • shiroininja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    17 days ago

    I’m not really bothered by these things. I walk around them just like I have to walk around humans and their detritus.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    17 days ago

    What law would I potentially break if I tipped one over?

    I’ve never seen one IRL where I live, they wouldn’t make much sense in suburbia, but I suppose I might come across one someday, if they keep multiplying.

  • toebert@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 days ago

    This may provide the first actual usecase for SUVs in cities. They seem to be about as tall as a child, so presumably invisible for the suv drivers.

    Hopefully the robots will get mowed down when trying to cross the street.

  • IPeaceInYourFace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    16 days ago

    The technology has emerged before the infrastructure.

    This is a fairly generic complaint that humans have had for 1000s of years.

    I wouldn’t worry about it.