Am I missing something, or is the point simply “I can build a computer program in a game that you may be surprised to learn is Turing complete, therefore ai is not sentient?”
I’m not here to argue that AI is sentient, but this is a really lousy argument.
HOLY SHIT, AGE OF EMPIRES II IS SENTIENT
“Man built brain out of simple particles, proving brains are not sentient.”
An article that just repeats the headline. What a waste of time.
Better than a headline leaving out the important bits
deleted by creator
The researcher didn’t make an LLM, he made a NAND gate, and in theory that could be expanded into an LLM
he made more than a NAND gate. he created a 1-bit perceptron and a perceptron-training circuit after figuring out how to make a NAND gate
Lost me at Microslop





