• Brkdncr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    11 days ago

    It’s pretty easy to regulate this:

    • Closed loop cooling
    • grid upgrade built into design plans, paid for by the datacenter.
    • cleaner power generation
    • officermike@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      11 days ago

      I’d say your list is a bit too short. Some more considerations (not comprehensive):

      • Construction noise and seismic limits (nearby neighborhoods have been disturbed and experienced damage from blasting operations)
      • Operating noise limits (ban on-site gas turbine generation, limit noise levels from cooling towers)
      • Limit light pollution

      Edit:

      • Job protections and guarantees for workers displaced by automation
      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Data centers ought to only be allowed in rural areas to begin with. Even if the noise/vibration/heat/etc. weren’t an issue they’re still a goddamn hole with zero foot traffic, and that’s just bad urbanism. They’re like public storage warehouses, but even worse.

        They need access to the Internet backbone, but that doesn’t mean they have to be in cities. Put 'em somewhere along the fiber halfway between.

      • Sonicdemon86@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        Still missing heat increase, up to 26°F in the surrounding area. All that heat from the gpus and cpus is a lot. I’ve heard of people using their gpus to heat their apartments.

        • 7101334@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 days ago

          There was a Bitcoin mining computer being marketed as a dual-purpose space heater lol

      • BorgDrone@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        Job protections and guarantees for workers displaced by automation

        Jobs are a necessary evil, not a goal in itself. The goal should be to eliminate all jobs.

        Until that time we should figure out a better way to share the burden of the work that nerds to be done as well as better way to distribute resources. Trying to preserve jobs is not the way.

      • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 days ago

        Datacenters aren’t responsible for workers displaced by automation.

        Construction and noise aren’t special to datacenters and don’t need special regulation.