I’m not an AI techie and I’m not well educated on LLMs/AI in general. The issue I’m having is the dichotomy between how people talk about it. I’ve heard completely opposite ends of the spectrum. From AI is quickly becoming advanced enough to threaten human society, all the way to its a glorified dictionary/search engine that can’t really do much of anything. I know Lemmy has a steep anti-AI slant. But, can someone talk about this in a way I can wrap my head around why the divide seems so big?

  • weps@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Hey, Socrates

    look for “emergent behaviour in computers” and specifically the non-programmed behaviour

    look for “floating point non determinism” to see how the same program can produce different results

    keep in mind you asked me on what I base that I think computers don’t only do what they are programmed to do

    • h0tbeef@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      You know, acting like a dickhead doesn’t really strengthen your argument.

      I’ll speak to someone less pompous about this