• rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Regardless of your feelings on ads/tracking being invasive, the fact of the matter is that’s how the website makes money

    It has nothing to do with feelings. The data they track has a value. You’re claiming they “aren’t making money off of you”. They are.

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Again, you missed my point. If you’re blocking those ads and trackers, they have no data from you and therefore you have no value to them.

      • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you’re blocking those ads and trackers, they have no data from you

        Let’s pause and pretend that’s true.

        ….Ahhh. 😃 if only.

    • cole@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      you’re wrong, actually. Google sells ads, not data. They USE data to target ads which is where the big bucks are. If you block ads, all the data in the world wouldn’t allow them to profit. So by blocking ads you are preventing Google from collecting any revenue from your participation

        • cole@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          well it doesn’t have any value if it can’t be sold or used

          • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            We can agree to disagree about this. I don’t think my obligation is to maximize my ARPU for Google. And given how malignant they are it’s now my mission to maliciously minimize my value to them. Maybe we are just on different wavelengths. Enjoy your Google services.

            • cole@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sure, but I think you were being intentionally misleading by disputing that Google isn’t making money off of you if block ads, despite the fact that that person was correct.

              • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                I go to a store, I see a nice shirt, I don’t buy it, but I tell a friend about the shirt and he goes to buy it. Did the store make money off of me?

                I watch a YouTube video and share it with a friend. That friend watches it and consumes ads (because my friend is a moron, sure). Did Google make money off of me?

                • cole@lemdro.id
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  But that wasn’t the point your were making. You were saying that the data has value in relation to your point, not the exposure. The implication you were making was that Google could still profit off the data

                  • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    They are pursuing a multi variate strategy. They want to collect data and sell ads. They are directly related to each other.