• thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I don’t think that Photocraft is superior. But the reason why its made so quickly is, because its vibe coded. There is no real engineering behind it, no good code quality and its not even a unique project; just stolen another project. And right now it’s even buggy as hell and unfinished mess with missing features too. Besides possible future licensing issues, I wouldn’t even use that program if it was good.

      I prefer GIMP over Photoshop or what this abomination of Photocraft is.

        • ItsNotImportant24@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          45 minutes ago

          My comment was about that person saying photo craft was made in a week and is superior. I was saying that, “photo craft was made in a week by AI, right?” Not about GIMP

          • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            28 minutes ago

            I wasn’t talking about GIMP. Photocraft is an exact copy of a program, that was designed and created for decades. My argument is, that Photocraft couldn’t be created in a few weeks if it was from scratch like GIMP or Photoshop was.

    • tirateimas@lemmy.pt
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Feel free to use it yourself then. Many of us will keep using GIMP, battle-tested and amazing piece of work.