PlayStation is erasing 1,318 seasons of Discovery shows from customer libraries | The change comes as Warner Bros. tries to add subscribers to Max, Discovery+ apps.::The change comes as Warner Bros. tries to add subscribers to Max, Discovery+ apps.

  • FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Fuck this shit.

    If buying isn’t owning. Piracy isn’t stealing.

    This is so anti consumer, I’m surprised the EU hasn’t stepped in to stop it yet

  • Alex@feddit.ro
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    If buying isn’t owning, then piracy isn’t stealing.

    • Rockyrikoko@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      If this isn’t theft, then the inverse isn’t either. Raise your flags, it’s time once again to sail the high seas

        • chitak166@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          It never was.

          You’re copying, not stealing. When you steal something, it is gone from the person you took it from. When you copy something, both of you have it.

          “Piracy” being stealing is exactly the same as “stealing” someone’s ideas. It’s a lame excuse so people richer than us can be even richer.

  • The Barto@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    10 months ago

    Streaming services: if we take the shows they purchased away from them, then they HAVE to subscribe to our service! There’s nothing they can do if they want to watch their shows, piracy is soooo 2008.

    • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah, it’s not like the Servarr application suite has made piracy literally easier than using streaming services.

      • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The caveat is that it’s still mostly just for moderately tech savvy individuals. It’s easier for the people who have the knowledge to set it up, have access to decent trackers, a VPN, newsgroups, and hardware to run the suite on.

        Piracy isn’t hard, but there is a barrier of entry that most people won’t overcome.

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    10 months ago

    If we break into people’s homes and destroy their property, maybe they’ll have to give us money to replace what was lost?

    Why has no one come up with this business strategy before.

  • AWittyUsername@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    10 months ago

    This is Warner Bros being the bad guys, but also Sony for not refunding people. Either way it doesn’t matter consumers lose out, all the more reason to pirate.

    • mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I see where you are coming from. The original version of streaming Netflix was the answer to piracy. Good price and had all the content one wanted. Was also easy to use. The streaming wars proved competition isn’t always the answer (I think this is the first time I’ve ever said that). Without that version of Netflix, the answer to piracy is gone…

      • StenSaksTapir@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Netflix was in competition with piracy. They competed mostly on two parameters: price and convenience, but catalog is also a secondary or tertiary parameter.

        Piracy is kinda free unless you pay for newsgroups, seedbox or straight up membership. It’s also inconvenient for most people. The catalog is basically unlimited if you know where to look.

        Paid streaming or digital purchases wins on convenience, but at a greater price and with a limited catalog.

        With older content constantly being bounced around different services, aggressive anti-shsring measures and continually rising prices, paid streaming is becoming less and less attractive, as we’re slowly sliding back to the times of cable TV, albeit video on-demand this time around.

      • User_4272894@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Competition is the answer, though. The problem is companies ended up competing the wrong way. If I could watch “The Office” on any streaming platform, suddenly they’re all in competition to create a better platform (quicker loads, different pricing models, integration with different devices, etc). By limiting shows to only certain platforms, sure, you’re creating an easy way to differentiate between platforms, but you’re letting the competition stagnate as you just create cable TV with extra steps: minimal choice, minimal ease of use, minimal cost upside.

      • chitak166@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Why should we care if corporations find the ‘answer to piracy’?

        What’s better for them is worse for us. Are you invested with them? If not, then you would be a textbook useful idiot to lower your standards so they can have even more.

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Damn. Maybe we shouldn’t have downloaded cars. It’s only fair that the capitalist collective should be able to delete our vhs and DVDs etc in return right?

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Keeping the money and yanking back the content it was used to purchase will surely entice those people to sign up for that Max/Discovery+ subscription.

    Only an out of touch corporate stooge would see a logical through line there.

    • chitak166@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      surely entice those people to sign up for that Max/Discovery+ subscription.

      That’s the sad part. It will. These people already have more money than sense, or else they wouldn’t be subscribing to streaming services at all.

    • samus12345@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      We download torrents, we use VPNs

      Drink up, me hearties, yo ho!

      Copyright law can kiss our rear ends

      Drink up, me hearties, yo ho!

  • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’d be a lot less bothered if the UI for services like Sony didn’t use words like “buy” to describe what customers are doing when they pay for content. It would be a lot more honest to describe it as a rental for an indefinite time period. But of course then very few people would choose that option.

  • zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    Maybe more people would subscribe to discovery if the content wasn’t so fucking abysmal. There’s like 2 good shows on there, Mythbusters and how it’s made

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    So AOL bought Warner Brothers and initiated a paroxysm of “new media” hype way back in the 1900s. They had no fucking clue what to do so they sold it. AT&T bought it more recently and pretended like a technology company should own content until they too realized they had seriously fucked up.

    Now right-wing “libertarian” David Zaslav is in charge of “Warner Brothers Discovery” and he could not give a flying fucking shit about content unless it’s time to destroy wokeness at CNN again, which he’s all about.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2023/11/15/magazine/david-zaslav-warner-media-discovery.html

    I’m starting to think Warner Brothers is cursed. Like, Monkey’s Paw cursed.

  • Shadywack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    Thermocline trust inversion, perfect example of why customer trust continues to erode and corporations continually lose credibility. Albeit Sony’s not the only bad actor here, it’s the overall agreements in place that were poor to begin with between businesses. The end result is a negative customer experience with all involved brands.

    When the industry fails like this, we go back to incentivizing torrents.

  • kworpy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Just let companies keep doing shit like this. They’re only leading people down the path that is piracy.