shamelessly stolen from nixCraft on mastodon

  • rattking@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yo dawg, we heard you like to install Linux so we installed the Linux installer over your Linux install so you can I don’t even know anymore

    • AccountMaker@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      I actually did this once. My USB was on /dev/sda instead of sdb and I didn’t bother to check. It took me like 2 days to fix it because you can’t just delete partitions and start over normally, it changes some flags on your drive that you need to manually reset for them to be usable again. Fun times.

      • 567PrimeMover@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Little Jimmy wanted to try Fedora, But little Jimmy is no more. For what he thought was his external drive, was actually his cerebral core

      • Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Try btrfs, where with only 5 hours of research you can create a swap file without writing the entire file.
        Also there is no other option, the 5h are non-optional.

        After doing that twice, In my / now lives

        /swapfile-howto
        # this is btrfs not a normal file system.
        # We have to create and allocate the file in a btrfs friendly way,
        # and tell btrfs to not move or segment it.
        
        touch /swapfile999
        chmod 600 /swapfile999
        truncate -s 0 /swapfile999
        chattr +C /swapfile999
        fallocate -l 999G /swapfile999
        mkswap /swapfile999
        swapon /swapfile999 -p 200
        
        • ashe@lemmy.starless.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          I admire your dedication, but you really could’ve just done this

          btrfs fi mkswapfile --size 16G /swap
          swapon /swap
          
          • Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Huh, thank you for telling me, I’ll amend the file with that info. This being a thing will probably spare many the troubles I experienced.

            I did some digging to reconstruct what happened in my case. The file was created on 2022-12-08, and I remember this being after I rediscovered my earlier approach, from - going by my browsing history - mid september 2022. I worked through plenty of wiki pages at the time, including the btrfs docs on swapfiles, where I probably got my commands. The truncate in there to fix earlier mistakes is something I would keep in, but not add myself, so I must have copied that pages solution. Interestingly, going by archive.org, between dec 02 and dec 13 the documentation on btrfs fi mkswapfile was added to that page.
            I am in no way confident in my memory here, but I vaguely recall seeing that command, and being somewhat surprised to not remember it from earlier. That confusion may have even contributed to pushing me to create the file.
            Had I seen it, I probably would have tried the command and seen it not exist. Following the note of btrfs 6.1 being required, I would have checked the version and seen that my distro didn’t have btrfs-progs 6.1, not even as an alpha on the development channel.
            I may also have remembered there being multiple commands needed earlier, and not wanting to deviate from the proven method dismissed the apparently simpler method.

            To complete this very meaningful and productive story, on 2022-12-23 my distro got the early christmas present of btrfs-progs 6.1 as an unstable release in the dev channel. After many retractions and republishings of a total of 4 subversions, on 2023-03-04 the first stable release of 6.1.x was made available.

            I was 6 months early. Or rather the btrfs devs were 6 months late.

            Edit (actually not edit because I didn’t send yet):
            I actually checked the repo and the documentation changed on dec 06. Here is the commit. The corresponding release occurred on dec 22.
            Dumping 30mins into writing this actually resulted with a memorable story. By chance I stumbled over the documentation of a new feature, 2 days after it had been written, but 2 weeks before even the first alpha release containing it was created.

    • kbotc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Disk Duplicator is a destroyer? Man, I used to image so many drives with DD back in my helpdesk days…

      • Affine Connection@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        dd does not stand for “disk duplicator”. That’s a modern backronymization that doesn’t reflect the original general usage of the command which is to “convert and copy”. Efficiently (with respect to I/O) copying raw data is only one of its intended purposes; it also converts text encodings.

  • foyrkopp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Anyone who hits enter on a dd command without triple-checking it gets exactly what they deserve.

    • Holzkohlen@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I just make use of my paranoia, so I triple and quadruple check. Then get a coffee and quadruple check again. Never messed up once

    • bzLem0n@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s even easier to prevent confusion if you use /dev/disk/by-id/ id’s, it only took a few times of overwriting the wrong disk to figure that out.

        • Nithanim@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Not sure if it is equal on all distros but on every one I have used it’s a readable string of muliple components. One of them is “usb” for a usb mass storage, so if it is the only one you have connected to your computer it is very obvious. For like sata disks it has the manufacturer and serial on it so you can match what drive it is you want to write to. Also, the name is pretty unique (on your sysytem at least, globally I don’t know), so even if you swap hardware around, you cannot write to the wrong storage if you got the right name. Like “sdb” can be reassigned, but the id is an id.