The ability to change features, prices, and availability of things you’ve already paid for is a powerful temptation to corporations.

  • poopkins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I don’t think it’s reasonable to expect every commercial product to find profitability through exposure. I can attest to this first hand as I had published an open source Android game that was republished without ads. This led me to ultimately make the repository private, because I could not find a way to remain profitable while offering the source code and bearing the costs of labor and various cloud services.

    On the flip side I guess I can take credit for the millions of installs from the other app… except they didn’t publicly acknowledge me.

    • psud@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Was it under a “copyleft” licence (like GPL) that forces the other one to also be open source? Did you use a licence that requires you are acknowledged?

      If you did the first, you at least pulled someone else into open source work