• thefartographer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    2 years ago

    Previous rulings such as Rubber v Glue and Face v Hand make this look like a really strong strategy

    • TWeaK@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      IANAL, but I think they should be in a far weaker position with their whole “if you don’t object within 30 days we will consider you to have accepted”. They can’t really argue that no positive action from the other party is construed as acceptance of a new contract. If there was continued use of the service that would be different, but no action cannot reasonably be construed as acceptance.

    • kalkulat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      Desperate strategy they’re hoping will fool some of the people some of the time.

      Trusting complete strangers with highly personal information is never a good idea. Even if they promise to take good care of it, before or after they’ve already got your money.