These early adopters found out what happened when a cutting-edge marvel became an obsolete gadget… inside their bodies.

      • olutukko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        Why not just any tech? It’s already obsolete. Nobody is going to profit from it. Why not let couple nerds tinker with it?

        • Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Fuck ANY. ALL or STFU and you have no right to broadcast any kind of deception of the people en masse no less.

            • Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Stop reading emoji’s in text just because you’re sensitive. Jesus would little to no respect for your emotion inserted into others instead of being a true reading. Because it shows that you’re the ignorant narcissist.

              Sure, there’ll be plenty to disagree with me but it doesn’t matter. I’m telling you the truth that you’re broadcasting about your emotional stuckage. IDGAF what people read when there’s nothnng there so I’m going ti ignore what you’re trying to say to me unless you somehow learn to pull the truth, pusher.

      • Armok: God of Blood@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        IDK, I probably wouldn’t want every anon having access to the source code for my cybereyes, let alone something like a pacemaker. Companies should be legally mandated to maintain devices like these for the average human life expectancy.

        • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          11 months ago

          Missing the fact Open Source software is generally more secure because more people are looking at the code. You don’t need to see the source to find a vulnerability, you do need it to patch one properly though.

          • CAVOK@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            It’s definitely one layer of security. If it’s your only layer then you’re in trouble.

        • Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Ignorance. You don’t understand any of the philosophy or the conduct of FOSS let alone close source.

          But…here…sign right here where the CIA/NSA/FBI/ETC. get any and all right to fuck you over any time the want to for any fucking reason.

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      This shit should be eminent domained and open sourced. It’s in the public’s best interest to have this tech available and if the people who invested in making it don’t want to support it or sell it to a company that will, they don’t need it anymore.

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      👏IS👏THIS👏A👏SONG👏SHOULD👏WE👏CLAP👏ALONG👏RAMA👏LAMA👏DING👏DONG👏SONG👏

    • Fades@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      They exist to make money not help humanity. Open source don’t make them money so they will never bother