• papertowels@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      According to the concept, should a number of people enjoy unfettered access to a finite, valuable resource such as a pasture, they will tend to over-use it

      Emphasis on bold. Seems like they shouldn’t have advertised it as unlimited and should’ve provided a finite cap.

      The line shouldn’t be drawn at “wherever I arbitrarily decide due to tragedy of the commons”. If you say it’s unlimited, honor it, or at least let folks graciously exit the platform.

      I wonder if the terms and conditions had such a limit tucked away.

      • wahming@monyet.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        at least let folks graciously exit the platform.

        Are you aware the plan was sunsetted two years ago? How much time do you need to graciously exit?

        As for finite, due to the laws of physics there’s obviously a limit. If I try backing up the entire Internet it’s obviously not gonna happen.

        • papertowels@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Are you aware the plan was sunsetted two years ago? How much time do you need to graciously exit?

          Based on the article, it seems like folks were just told that their data would be put into read only. How much notice was given for data deletion?

          As for finite, due to the laws of physics there’s obviously a limit. If I try backing up the entire Internet it’s obviously not gonna happen.

          How’s a consumer supposed to know the limit if you advertise unlimited? Sounds like an explicit cap should’ve been written into the fine print. Why are you supporting “unlimited, but I will cut you off whenever I feel like it” versus, for example, what cellular plans typically advertise: “unlimited, but you get deprioritized after x gigs”

          The former just seems to be not consumer friendly.