• phillaholic@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    11 months ago

    If you consider each instance as the “person” it’s essentially libertarianism.

    • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      No, each instance is more like a country with it’s own laws, and trade agreements with other countries to share or block content.

      • phillaholic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        In real life you’re probably not traversing three or more countries in a single day. You’re much closer to small communities at this scale, and having all these differences at that level is terrible for community building. Reddit was complicated enough with subreddit specific rules for regular people. Now you may not be able to find the same content as your friend if they signed up for a different instance, which is suggested as a feature not a bug. It’s exactly the same time of idealism without thoughts of consequence that libertarianism has.

        • Tavarin@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I was going to use communities as my examples due to the relatively small size of each, but decided country was a better metaphor due to each instance’s ability to fully control their own rules or “laws”, where as communities in the real world are usually beholden to the higher laws of their countries.

          • phillaholic@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yes. Imagine if every culdasac had its own set of laws that you’d have to consider. Some your friends can’t come i to. Others don’t acknowledge the culdasac next door exists. Sure you could move to the culdasac you fit in with the best, but I wouldn’t want to limit my friends or interests that narrowly, nor would I want those things to be taken away from me and be forced to move all the time. I don’t see it as better.

          • phillaholic@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Yes. Imagine if every culdasac had its own set of laws that you’d have to consider. Some your friends can’t come i to. Others don’t acknowledge the culdasac next door exists. Sure you could move to the culdasac you fit in with the best, but I wouldn’t want to limit my friends or interests that narrowly, nor would I want those things to be taken away from me and be forced to move all the time. I don’t see it as better.

      • Lucia [she/her]@eviltoast.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Nah, the Fediverse is based on freedom of association while most people live in countries they were born in and leaving one is really hard in most cases. Not to mention that ‘self-hosting’ a state just for yourself would be considered an extremism by existing states.

        The Fediverse is clearly a libertarian idea.