More than 200 Substack authors asked the platform to explain why it’s “platforming and monetizing Nazis,” and now they have an answer straight from co-founder Hamish McKenzie:

I just want to make it clear that we don’t like Nazis either—we wish no-one held those views. But some people do hold those and other extreme views. Given that, we don’t think that censorship (including through demonetizing publications) makes the problem go away—in fact, it makes it worse.

While McKenzie offers no evidence to back these ideas, this tracks with the company’s previous stance on taking a hands-off approach to moderation. In April, Substack CEO Chris Best appeared on the Decoder podcast and refused to answer moderation questions. “We’re not going to get into specific ‘would you or won’t you’ content moderation questions” over the issue of overt racism being published on the platform, Best said. McKenzie followed up later with a similar statement to the one today, saying “we don’t like or condone bigotry in any form.”

  • ZeroCool@feddit.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I just want to make it clear that we don’t like Nazis either

    Actions speak louder than words. Fuck Substack and fuck any platform that offers a safe haven for nazis.

    • whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 months ago

      “I want you to know that I don’t like nazis. But I am fine platforming them and profiting from them. Now here is some bullshit about silencing ‘ideas.’”

  • justastranger@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    This tracks with my previous attempts at reporting that Sinfest guy. Posts hundreds of comics that blatantly break multiple official substack content guidelines and I get the effective equivalent of a promise for “action” combined with a dismissive eye roll. They completely ignored my follow-up email detailing the complete lack of action and the dozen or so new content guideline violations.

  • Gamers_Mate@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    “we don’t like or condone bigotry in any form.” I mean they are litterally Condoning bigotry.

    “His response similarly doesn’t engage other questions from the Substackers Against Nazis authors, like why these policies allow it to moderate spam and newsletters from sex workers but not Nazis.”

    Doesn’t seem very consistent.

      • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        “We do not condone Nazi propaganda, but we are very concerned about sex work causing social degeneracy.”

    • admiralteal@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Condone (transitive verb): To overlook, forgive, or disregard (an offense) without protest or censure.

      Neat.

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Interesting, I generally think of the Merriam-Webster definition:

        to regard or treat (something bad or blameworthy) as acceptable, forgivable, or harmless

        Or perhaps even further than that: actually approving of something. Guess “condone” is a little weaker of a word than I thought. But its popularity calls for being extra careful of even overlooking wrongdoing.

  • TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Yea… Meta took the same “free peaches” approach and the entire fucking globe is now dealing with various versions of white nationalism. So like, can we actually give censorship of hate a fucking try for once? I’m willing to go down that road.

  • Unaware7013@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    TIL that Substack is apparently a bunch of crypto-fascists who expect people to believe they don’t support Nazis, they just give them money and a place at their table to talk about it.

  • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    We already knew that SS liked Nazis.

    All joking aside, silencing Nazis and deplatforming them is LITERALLY fighting against them. How is allowing them to make money and market themselves on your platform doing anything to stem the tide of Nazism? Obviously they’re playing culture war games and saying they’re not.

    • prole@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Yeah, people don’t seem to realize how insidious this shit is. Unfettered capitalism is allowing these fuckers to gain credibility and giving them a soapbox under the guise of “free speech.”

      The desire for profit above all else, combined with the fact that the last of the people alive during (and old enough to understand) WW2 dying off, has been allowing fascism to wrap its filthy tendrils around our society once again. Preventing these people from taking power needs to be our priority, but unfortunately, constantly having to fight against this shit impedes all other progress.

      Free speech is not absolute. Fascists (and particularly ones that call themselves Nazis) have no place in modern society, and they should be given no quarter because we’ve seen what happens if we don’t root them out.

      This is not just a disagreement on policy, or a mere difference of opinion. These people literally want my friends dead.

  • maegul@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    For anyone who remembers the interview the CEO did with the Verge back when they launched Notes, this isn’t surprising at all.

    You can see a transcript here. The relevant section can be found by searching all brown people are animals or more specifically just animals and reading on from there.

    I’m not sure if the video footage of the interview is still available, but it’s even worse because you can see that the CEO is completely lost when talking about the idea of moderating anything and basically shuts down because they have nothing to say all while the interview is politely berating them about how they’re obviously failing a litmus test.

    Do note that above the point where “animals” occurs is some post-hoc context provided by the interviewer (perhaps why the video is no longer easily available?) where they point out that the question they asked and the response they got wasn’t exactly as extreme as it first appeared. But they also point out that it’s still very notable despite the slightly mitigating correction and I’d agree entirely, especially if you watch(ed) the video and clocked the CEO’s demeanor and lack of any intelligent thought on the issue.

    • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Oh yeah that’s the classic. The interviewer describes himself as one of the targets, even, and that still doesn’t make it real for this fuck.

    • wagoner@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Ha, one of the alternatives is Revue by Twitter for their platform, which I thought had been discontinued (article is dated 2022). But button seems to be a promising alternative that they describe.

      • breakfastmtn@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yeah, Buttondown seem great. They can migrate you from Substack so people don’t even need to re-subscribe which is pretty cool. They’re also active on Mastodon and just added anti-Nazi terms to their ToS. They seem pretty responsive to the community in terms of adding suggested features.

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    On one hand, Substack is in it’s rights and as a journalistic organization, they are in the right.

    The issue is: Once you serve a Nazi in your bar, you become a Nazi bar. Substack is going to become shitty, and fast. They will lose high engagement users, first when the ones who protested pile out for another platform and then quickly when the quality dips.

    Also, their cavalier attitude will change when Stripe steps in.

      • OmanMkII@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I was too, but sounds like the TL;DR is they’re the supporting infrastructure which substack uses:

        Substack’s team built its service on Stripe’s infrastructure, which bypassed significant investment in engineering. By leaning on Stripe’s expertise, Substack could scale quickly and focus its energy on fulfilling its promise to writers. The company offers better services because it can continue to lean on Stripe and direct extra bandwidth toward customers.

        https://stripe.com/ae/customers/substack

    • gian @lemmy.grys.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      The issue is: Once you serve a Nazi in your bar, you become a Nazi bar.

      So if a Nazi buy [a service] then the [service offerer] is a Nazi.

      So every [service offerer] in the world is probably Nazi, since probably every [service offerer] in the world has at least a Nazi customer.

      Interesting approach, now what we should do about all these Nazi [service offerer] ?

  • Chozo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    I just want to make it clear that we don’t like Nazis either—we wish no-one held those views.

    “But we’ll gladly host those views on our platform, run ads alongside them, and profit from them.”

  • Alsephina@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Another day of thanking god the devs for the decentralized Fediverse and Lemmy 🙏😔

  • ourob@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    (transcribed from a series of tweets) - iamragesparkle

    I was at a shitty crustpunk bar once getting an after-work beer. One of those shitholes where the bartenders clearly hate you. So the bartender and I were ignoring one another when someone sits next to me and he immediately says, “no. get out.” And the dude next to me says, “hey i’m not doing anything, i’m a paying customer.” and the bartender reaches under the counter for a bat or something and says, “out. now.” and the dude leaves, kind of yelling. And he was dressed in a punk uniform, I noticed

    Anyway, I asked what that was about and the bartender was like, “you didn’t see his vest but it was all nazi shit. Iron crosses and stuff. You get to recognize them.”

    And i was like, ohok and he continues. "you have to nip it in the bud immediately. These guys come in and it’s always a nice, polite one. And you serve them because you don’t want to cause a scene. And then they become a regular and after awhile they bring a friend. And that dude is cool too. And then THEY bring friends and the friends bring friends and they stop being cool and then you realize, oh shit, this is a Nazi bar now. And it’s too late because they’re entrenched and if you try to kick them out, they cause a PROBLEM. So you have to shut them down.

    And i was like, ‘oh damn.’ and he said “yeah, you have to ignore their reasonable arguments because their end goal is to be terrible, awful people.”

    And then he went back to ignoring me. But I haven’t forgotten that at all.

  • Dra@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Gen Z needs to understand the historical lesson that the Blues Brothers taught those before them. Illinois Nazis exist, and some days they demonstrate, as per their right to freedom of speech - but this is as much as an opportunity to humiliate them and openly critique the mindset as anyone else. Dark little underground communities flourish behind closed doors.