Hi everyone im new to the OSM community but eager to contribute. Im curious how many of you use OSM on android phones and how you interact with it. I’m interested both in terms of contributing but also using it for its map functionality e.g. navigation. Based in my early research so far the most popular apps seem to be:

  • OsmAnd
  • Vespucci
  • Maps.me
  • StreetComplete
  • Organic maps
  • Magic Earth

Im really looking for your opinions on what apps are worth using and for what purpose. Do you just use one app or multiple apps for different purposes. Which app would you recommend to your tech savvy friend and which to your mum? There’s probably a bunch more i haven’t mentioned so please also highlight them and any strengths or weaknesses they have. Thanks 😊

  • abominable_panda@lemmy.worldEnglish
    8·
    1 year ago

    I have all of them installed except maps. me… kind of looking for the best one myself

    Editors:

    Streetcomplete is for quickly contributing small details - very easy and user friendly.

    Vespucci is for advanced editing - advanced. It has its uses on the go but i personally prefer using the web editor for bigger contributions

    Maps:

    Osmand. Feature packed but can be slow.

    Organic - lighter weight. Updates the map monthly (or longer)

    Magic earth - not open source, but that gives it the ability to pull traffic data from closed sources therefore apparently very good for driving navigation

    • JackOfNoTrades@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      6·
      1 year ago

      Hey that’s really helpful thanks. I’ve also had most of them installed the last week and just trying them out (except not driving).

      I agree street complete is really easy for quick edits, also organic maps for editing in a similar way to Google maps e.g. adding business opening hours, or business websites etc.

      It’s interesting to learn Magic Earth is good for driving I may have to try it out. I’m currently mostly using organic for navigation.

      Do you recommend using the advanced editing apps (Vespucci, OsmAnd) for editing or using the ID editor on the OSM website?

      • abominable_panda@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        1 year ago

        I’d say thats honestly down to personal preference… For shapes/ polygons and bulk edits, im better using my keyboard and mouse. I only use the editing apps on the go to fill the odd incomplete detail or add a node/ shop. But thats just me. Use what you find easiest and most appropriate :)

  • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.mlEnglish
    6·
    1 year ago

    Fully degoogled myself over a year ago, tested every OSM-based map software I could find, here’s my short conclusion:

    For non-techy users who wanna get rid of Google maps but want an easy no muss no fuss, Magic Earth. IMO, it’s the closest you can get to Google maps without using Google.

    Has basic traffic routing, pretty good with addresses and locations, clean UI, overall very solid app.

    I also use OSMand, it’s both better and worse than Magic Earth. It’s NOT for beginners IMO, the defaults are pretty horrible. Messy UI, confusing interface, slow and cluttered. But OSMand is a tinkerer’s app, if you have the time and interest, you can make it work very well and look pretty good too.

    • JackOfNoTrades@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      My first impression of OsmAnd was that it’s cluttered and unintuitive so it’s interesting to see how many people recommend it. Will try to tinker and see if I can get it to work for me.

      Also magic earth and organic are both ones I’m gonna have to compare to find which suits me as my primary navigation app

      • Lettuce eat lettuce@lemmy.mlEnglish
        2·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, same impressions for me when I first tried it. I would say it took me a good 5-10 hours total of tweaking, testing, and tuning to get it to a point where it’s usable for me, fairly clean looking, and practically functional.

        Magic Earth is super easy, you download the app, search an address, and go there, nothing more, nothing less.

        OsmAnd can do some really awesome stuff, fully custom profiles for walking, driving, boating, mass transit, hiking off road and more, fully modular UI elements, custom maps, custom voices, custom routing/navigation engines, custom layer elements with dozens of options, fully customizable navigation graphics, color, size, arrow style, etc.

        But the documentation is spotty, unintuitive, and discordant. The community is generally friendly and helpful, but it still ends up being a lot of work to get OsmAnd working well IMO. Is it worth it? Only you can judge that for yourself. If all you care about is stopping big corpos from spying on you, Magic Earth and other OSM-based apps like Organic maps is fine.

        If you insist on using FOSS software and want the maximal amount of customizability and fine-tuning, OsmAnd+ is the peak.

      • zemon@lemmy.mlEnglish
        1·
        1 year ago

        Funnily enough, from the first time I felt OSMAnd more intuitive than gmaps. Overwhelming setting options, yeah, but it felt like home to me.

  • Showroom7561@lemmy.caEnglish
    6·
    1 year ago

    I like to keep things “simple”, so while I’ve tried pretty much all of the OSM-based apps for Android, I consistently use the following:

    • OSMAnd+ (pretty much for all nagivation, route planning, etc.).
    • StreetComplete (this is great for confirming/adding details for a POI based on a fun question and answer format).
    • OSM Go! (both web and app. I use this mainly for quickly adding basic POIs like bike parking, water fountains, public toilets, etc.)
    • Every Door (specifically for adding addresses and details to buildings).
    • JackOfNoTrades@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      Hey, thanks for your answer. I’ll have to look into OSM Go! and Every Door since they’re not ones I’ve heard of

  • booklovero@lemmy.mlEnglish
    4·
    1 year ago

    I am back to using google maps here and there. I haven’t been using it for 2 years but relying on gmaps in the short term is better than relying on nothing if the map is not yet covered by osm. At the same time I improve the osm map until it becomes usable.

    Osmand is for hikin, biking, skating, quick overview for cars, map exploring, etc… for actual car driving, I use magic earth because it’s a navigation system. Osmand is a map with routing capabilities.

    SCEE is better than SC. I ditched SE once SCEE came out. Every door is useful for bulk editing.

    For armchair mapping josm, ofc.

    I’d recommend that you use the app that’s appropriate for the job and not the skill level.

    Osmand is best for hiking. better than any other map, yes better than gmaps, here, bing, etc. Magic earth is better for car navigation than gmaps. Every door is very quick in documenting the number of floors buildings have. Josm is very efficient in documenting the roof color of buildings. SCEE is great for documenting road surfaces.

    • palitu@lemmy.perthchat.orgEnglish
      2·
      1 year ago

      Interesting thought about osmand. I’ve used it for years, but never had that vibe, though I am not too involved with the devs.

      Why do you think that?

  • AlpacaChariot@lemmy.worldEnglish
    2·
    1 year ago

    OSMand is great, I use it all the time for driving and also hiking - it’s surprisingly good for footpaths.

    Out of the box it’s not great at UK postcodes (some are in the dataset but not all). However, there’s an open source list of post codes defined as points of interest that you can import, which means you can just search (offline) for any post code and it will take you straight to it.

    https://github.com/hvdwolf/OsmAnd-UKpostcodes/blob/master/README.md

    People from other countries with different systems may not appreciate how useful this is, in most cases if you navigate to a UK post code you can see your destination so no further information is required.