• jabjoe@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is economics now, not politics. US can go full crazy Trump, but the grid will just keep getting greener as greener is cheapest. He can rant and rave about global warming being a conspiracy or anything else, but it’s unstoppable now.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 months ago

      The infuriating thing to me is, renewable energy is often extremely independent. It means no reliance on foreign oil. That SHOULD be the most American thing, especially for those in the GOP who claim to be anti-government.

      Goes to remind you their main product is hypocrisy.

    • Darkhoof@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      No, the grid won’t get greener if Trump is elected because he WILL go full dictator. And he will revert everything that is being done currently.

      • jabjoe@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        He’ll struggle to make states to buy more expensive energy. If he managed, he’d put the state at a global disadvantage. Even then, he’d have to outlaw solar to stop people installing it at home.

        • zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          That’s what tanking the EPA is for. Without any oversight of externalities, dirty energy becomes cheaper.

            • zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Yes the Environmental Protection Agency. The Heritage foundation is taking applications and they vet by looking at whether their social media accounts supports Trump: https://www.project2025.org/

              Last time Trump did their best to push responsible people out of government jobs, but that was just a test run. This time around it would be a speed run.

              Edit: per Wikipedia https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_2025

              The plan would perform a swift takeover of the entire executive branch under a maximalist version of the unitary executive theory

              • jabjoe@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                11 months ago

                Like a lot Trump stuff, that is a whole bag of crazy! Yet another reason to hope he doesn’t get in.

            • wikibot@lemmy.worldB
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              Here’s the summary for the wikipedia article you mentioned in your comment:

              The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is an independent agency of the United States government tasked with environmental protection matters. President Richard Nixon proposed the establishment of EPA on July 9, 1970; it began operation on December 2, 1970, after Nixon signed an executive order. The order establishing the EPA was ratified by committee hearings in the House and Senate. The agency is led by its administrator, who is appointed by the president and approved by the Senate. The current administrator is Michael S. Regan. The EPA is not a Cabinet department, but the administrator is normally given cabinet rank. The EPA has its headquarters in Washington, D.C., regional offices for each of the agency's ten regions, and 27 laboratories.The agency conducts environmental assessment, research, and education. It has the responsibility of maintaining and enforcing national standards under a variety of environmental laws, in consultation with state, tribal, and local governments. EPA enforcement powers include fines, sanctions, and other measures. It delegates some permitting, monitoring, and enforcement responsibility to U.S. states and the federally recognized tribes. The agency also works with industries and all levels of government in a wide variety of voluntary pollution prevention programs and energy conservation efforts. The agency's budgeted employee level in 2023 is 16,204.1 full-time equivalent (FTE). More than half of EPA's employees are engineers, scientists, and environmental protection specialists; other employees include legal, public affairs, financial, and information technologists.

              article | about

    • Spaceballstheusername@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Still plenty that can be done to stop it. Preventing transmission lines, giving even bigger subsidies to fossil fuels, putting large tarrifs on imported solar panels and wind turbines. Just look at California the power monopoly is in with Gavin Newsom and they created rules that protect their profits above all else and now solar installs is at 20% what it was before.

      • jabjoe@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        You mean 120% of what it was? 20% of what it was means way cheaper, and I’m sure you mean more expensive.

        Sure but it’s self defeating, making things more expensive. Putting that whole state/country at a disadvantage against those who use cheap clean power instead of fighting it.

        • Spaceballstheusername@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I think you’re unfamiliar with California’s new policy it doesn’t change the cost to install but how much you pay and make for electricity. Basically now you sell electricity to the grid for 3-5 cents and buy it for like 10-15 but then they tack on like 20 cents in transmission fees. So it has made solar not cost effective anymore in most residential cases. So the total number of yearly installs has decreased to 20% compared to last year. But my point was a radical government can do plenty of stuff to sabotage progress in order to keep themselves and friends in power.

          • jabjoe@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Don’t sell to the grid if you can avoid it. Charge a house battery, charge a EV, run all your stuff for the day. Always better to use than sell back to the grid anyway.

            But my larger point was that by harming green energy, you harm energy costs and harm the economy. It becomes less competitive to economies who ride reality instead of fight it.

            And yes, I don’t know California policies. Hand up, I’m a Brit who just champions green energy transitions. I watch https://grid.iamkate.com with glee.

    • Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      No. No it’s not. EOTW in a decade tops. If it ain’t hell incarnate then it’ll be a virus, bio-, tech-, software, etc., maybe that comet, whatever. Unless you FOSS everything NOW…Goodbye…forever.