Beeper users say Apple is now blocking their Macs from using iMessage entirely::The Apple-versus-Beeper saga is not over yet it seems, even though the iMessage-on-Android Beeper Mini was removed from the Play Store last week. Now,

  • Merlin404@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    8 months ago

    FUCK APPLE, but they have so many people that let them ass fuck them they continue to do shits like this

    • vmachiel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      Devils advocate here: it’s their webservice right? They determine who can access it.

      If there were legislation that would force them to make it interoperable that would be one thing. But you can’t just demand access to their infrastructure.

        • helenslunch@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          8 months ago

          They’re not blocking reverse engineering. They’re blocking unauthorized access to their servers.

          • Deebster@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            You’re being unnecessarily pedantic. Apple was blocking interoperability and reverse engineering found a solution—and Apple is blocking that solution.

        • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Exactly, dick moves don’t need to be illegal to be dick moves. It’s like the constant price/ad increases. You can, but we’re gonna bitch and encourage people to stop supporting you because it’s a dick move

      • beatle@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Agreed. Apple provides a free service locked to their hardware. It shouldn’t be surprising that they patched the vulnerabilities and blocked accounts.

      • helenslunch@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        They have interoperability. There are 1000+ interoperable messaging platforms you can use on iOS. Problem is they’re not “convenient” since SMS is the only interoperable standard that EVERY phone already has and you can’t use any other messaging app with SMS fallback, which is the only feature iMessage has that the others don’t.

        There needs to be legislation that requires them to have unlockable bootloaders, to allow 3rd party app stores, and to be able to use other apps for SMS. And it needs to happen 10 years ago.

        The fact that you need Apple’s permission before you can install any software on your device, and that Apple gets 30% of EVERY SINGLE FUCKING DIME YOU SEND in literally any fucking app is appalling and embarrassing.

    • gregorum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      “How dare you cut me off for violating the TOS like you said you would! I’m entitled to use your private property however I like without your permission or consequences!”

      Lmao

  • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    Why would you use an OS from a company that openly messes with everything it gives you?

    ICQ died for a small fraction of what they are doing, going from the default IM (in some countries, including mine) to something with only red flowers seen in the buddylist when you launch it once a month to get that sleepy graveyard nostalgic feeling, and that happened in a few months.

    Now trojans are seen as normal by people who understand that they are talking about a trojan.

    We often treat “normies” as people for whom fashion\easiness is more important than the reality of what they are choosing.

    But apparently it’s come to the situation where they just can’t escape Apple, MS, Google, others, due to knowledge lacking and being hostage to some functionality and network effects, if such mechanisms are socially relevant now.

    Interesting to see this dynamic of choosing protest over using something else.

    Almost like all that late XIX and early XX century spirit with Marx and worker movements, only from consumers, really weird.

    • accideath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      Why? Because Windows is shit and Linux can’t run the software I need. Also, the Apple OSes are generally pretty nice to use, if you ignore the Apple shenanigans.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        8 months ago

        Because Windows is shit and Linux can’t run the software I need.

        I’ve already answered something like that, but less specific, for you, it was a rhetorical question.

        Also, the Apple OSes are generally pretty nice to use, if you ignore the Apple shenanigans.

        I’ve tried and felt that Windows may not be so bad, but to each his own.

    • Killer_Tree@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      ICQ… Now there’s a name I haven’t heard in a long time. I used to use the crap out of that service, but I can’t for the life of me recall what killed it anymore than I can recall migrating from AIM.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        They started breaking alternative clients intentionally with small protocol changes. Instead of just eating it everybody changed IMs, fast.

    • halva@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      like the other person said, modern windows is infinitely worse in just about every aspect of its design (you have to fight it if you just want to use your computer without microsoft 3rd wheeling it) and linux app support ranges from “ok” to “straight up doesn’t exist and cannot be ran through any shenanigans”

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Well, I’m a Linux user to the degree that then I argue about other systems, it’s just to blabber, I’m not really interested. It’s “here be dragons” for me, some epilepsy-inducing horror on one side and Johnny Ive (or whatever it is now) on another.

        So feel free to not put much effort =)

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Now, Apple customers who used Beeper’s apps are reporting that they’ve been banned from using iMessage on their Macs — a move Apple may have taken to disable Beeper’s apps from working properly, but ultimately penalizes its own customers for daring to try a non-Apple solution for accessing iMessage.

    But the latter only found short-lived success, as Apple quickly figured out how to disable Beeper Mini from being able to reliably deliver messages.

    The tech giant’s actions soon caught the attention of lawmakers, leading a bipartisan group of legislators to implore the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate Apple’s “potential anticompetitive treatment” of the Beeper Mini application.

    Admitting up front that third-party software was to blame would sometimes result in the support rep being able to lift the ban, some noted.

    As for Apple, it originally said Beeper techniques had “posed significant risks to user security and privacy, including the potential for metadata exposure and enabling unwanted messages, spam, and phishing attacks.”

    Beeper put an end to its efforts to continue to develop an iMessage solution last month after releasing its latest software.


    The original article contains 584 words, the summary contains 183 words. Saved 69%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • colforge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    8 months ago

    I know I’ll get downvotes for this but I switched from Android to iPhone after years and years of using Android while knowing I wouldn’t be able to use iMessage features texting Android users. While knowing I couldn’t and would likely never be easily able to sideload apps, heck even after they had already taken the headphone jack away. I literally do not care about any of that for the purpose for which I use my phone. I just want it to work, without having to endlessly tweak and customize and modify. I like that it does what it says it does out of the box and does so smoothly and reliably.

    I like that it integrates well with other apple products. I have exactly 3 contacts I use the native messaging app for. The rest have all been communicating with me through Messenger or Telegram or WhatsApp for years anyway — I’d MUCH rather see governments prioritize making those services talk to each other so I could uninstall two of them but I don’t ever see anyone talking about that even though Apple haters love to bash Apple over iMessage - while ignoring that the RCS protocol Google uses has proprietary bullshit built on top of it meaning that even if Apple adopted the protocol itself the interaction between iPhone and android messages would still be messy.

    As I said I know I’ll get downvotes for this but I also know I’m far from alone and this is exactly why Apple has the power it does: it gives its users what they want, even if non-Apple users don’t see it that way. I see so many arguments against Apple that fail to take that into account.

    • Lad@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      8 months ago

      I had an iPhone 13 pro max and it was an excellent device. Everything it could do it did very well and had outstanding battery life, build quality, and cameras.

      I only got rid of it because I wanted torrents and emulators. If you’re aware of the limitations of iOS and you’re okay with them, iPhones are really great.

      • ji17br@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        I don’t think you’re supposed to post reasonable, level-headed opinions regarding Apple on here. Against the rules or something

          • ji17br@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Go into any technology thread that mentions Apple in the title and you’ll see that’s not the case. It’s rare to find a comment that uses actual facts, mostly just opinions of people who have never used an Apple product complaining that they suck.