• Kitten_Mittens@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Considering it was just meant to be a proof of concept and only fly once or twice I would say that 71 flights, a max altitude of 78 ft(24 m), and 10.6 miles or 17 kilometers of travel, not to mention all of the footage from its on board cameras, makes Ingenuity an astounding success.

    • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      8 months ago

      NASA’s rovers have been kicking ass for the last few decades. Truly a testament to how great their engineering teams are

    • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      8 months ago

      Especially considering the use of off-the-shelf Snapdragon 801.

      There’s some nice discussion about Ingenuity here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26177619

      …This processor will have not flips on Mars, possibly up to every few minutes. Their solution is to hold two copies of memory and double check operations as much as possible, and if any difference is detected they simply reboot. Ingenuity will start to fall out of the sky, but it can go through a full reboot and come back online in a few hundred milliseconds to continue flying.
      -jhurliman

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        8 months ago

        I think it exceeded everyone’s expectations. I know I’m pretty astounded. I didn’t realize it had been three years!

    • Transporter Room 3@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      It’s almost definitely because it doesn’t have Line Of Sight to establish the connection.

      Sort of like how cheap fpv drones will lose video when you fly into another room because the thin drywall blocks the signal enough and the signal can’t bounce off other objects in the right way.

      So I’m going with “once the rover catches up like last time it’ll be fine”