Happy 30th Birthday “New Technology” File System! Thanks for 30 years of demonstrating Linux superiority with a gap that widens with every new kernel release 👍

      • Confetti Camouflage@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nothing inherently wrong with NTFS itself as a filesystem besides being proprietary, and Microsoft supplies absolutely no support for using it in Linux. All the work done to get it running in Linux has been from the ground up and it shows. Many times I’ve had a hiccup on my external drives and they completely lock up until they’re repaired on a windows machine. Unfortunately NTFS is one of the only journaled file system that works on both Windows, Apple, and Linux.

        There has also been a lot of advances for filesystems like checksumming so you know when you get bitrot. Or copy-on-write which can take snapshots of a file and then further changes are stored as the difference. You can then rollback to any snapshot you’ve taken.

          • Dax87@forum.stellarcastle.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            The only reason why there’s NTFS hate in the Linux community is because it’s associated with windows.

            This tribalism bullshit is tiring.

              • Dax87@forum.stellarcastle.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Yes, NTFS lacks features that surely one of the many Linux filesystems have. But it also has features others do not. There is no one-siize-fits-all filesystem.

                • Ext4 is generally faster than NTFS, but cannot handle as large of files
                • ZFS has a multitude of features that NTFS does not, like zraid, dedup, etc., but usually at the cost of RAM.
                • BTRFS is included in the Linux kernel and also has many features, like being able to conveniently switch hard drive raid-like configurations on the fly with rebalance, but doesn’t support fs-level encryption
                • NTFS lacks in many features the others do not, and is a “non-standard” filesystem. However, it’s one of the few with better cross-platform support, more advanced access control, pre-emptive journaling, reparse points, etc.

                It’s quite obvious that my calling out tribalism has felt to you an attack.

                We get enough of this “us vs them” mentality in literally every topic and medium. I’d just like a little more nuance and genuine discourse. So I apologize if I’ve offended you.