• Eezyville@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I feel the same but I also cannot avoid some sites. Ohio’s unemployment and job board only works with Chrome based sites and I have to use those when I’m in between jobs.

    • aStonedSanta@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      This brings up an interesting thought though. Should governments and states be able to prefer you to use a certain browser or should they be required to make the website function on all…

        • WiseThat@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          But then how will congress give taxpayer dollars to a private company to do a terrible job?

          I mean, we COULD have a government run agency that retains skilled engineers and keeps a good talent and knowledge pool of people specialized at delivering services that hundreds of millions of people rely on OR we could give money to the lowest bidder and blame “government inefficiency” for the contractor’s fuckups.

      • Hagdos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        You would have to find a good definition of “all browsers”, and I think that would be nearly impossible.

        I absolutely agree that governments should support Firefox, that’s a reasonable claim. But do they need to support the earliest version of netscape? Or the browser I made as a hobby project last week and published as open source? There’s a limit to what’s reasonable and workable.