• FaceDeer@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I googled “zero lock staking” and I’m not finding anything that contradicts what I said. There are systems that allow for delegated staking, where you hold transferable tokens that represent a share in a staking pool - rETH, for example. But there’s still locked stake in that case. And this Quora response lists various proof-of-stake systems where you can unstake immediately, including Cardano and Polkadot, but those don’t give you rewards while your tokens aren’t staked - the token still needs to be locked during the staking itself.

    I asked for clarification on what you found “damning” about the transition to proof of stake, I don’t see how asking for clarification is “misinformation.”

    I presented a source for Ethereum’s centralization trends. Got any of your own?

    • anon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      of course you don’t get rewards if you spend your staked tokens. How TF else should they do it?!

      It is not locked in chains like Polkadot and Cardano. You can, quite literally, stake your coins then two seconds later spend them. They aren’t locked from being spent. That is called ZERO LOCK or LIQUID STAKING. THERE IS NO LOCK PERIOD LIKE THEY HAVE IN ETH.

      At this point, I am done arguing about literal facts with an ETH bagholder.

      • FaceDeer@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Wow, you went from zero to furious at the drop of a hat. And I’m not a “bagholder”, as I’ve said in other comments, I’m just interested in the tech.

        I haven’t argued any of these facts. “How TF else should they do it?!” could be my line here, except that I’m trying to remain civil so I wouldn’t have worded it that way. This ultimately comes from your statement:

        Another damning aspect of their staking tech is that, in order to stake to a pool, you need to lock your tokens away, making them impossible to spend for a specified time period.

        Which I still don’t see as “damning” because - as you just said - how else would they do it? Cardano and Polkadot do it the same way, they’ve just changed the value of what that “specified time period” is.

        I specifically mentioned Rocket Pool’s rETH as an example of delegated staking that would let you sell your staked tokens more quickly, that’s on Ethereum so if the exit queue is too long for you there you can try that instead.

        • anon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I am not furious. I just don’t like it when people lie and act like they’re not lying.

          If you’ve retained control over your tokens then they’re not staked. I’m not sure how you think it could work otherwise.

          • FaceDeer@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            And I’m not particularly pleased to be accused of lying when I’m willing to cite sources and the guy I’m debating with refuses to even address my responses. But you don’t see me YELLING IN ALL CAPS about it.