• clgoh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    The banking industry uses at least 50x more, right?

    • Snekeyes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      Lets talk about the bank branchs, data centers, and energy consumption vs crypto.

      "Research has found that bitcoin miners alone consume approximately between 60 to 125 TWh of energy annually, which is equivalent to around 0.6% of global electricity

      “Traditional banks’ total annual energy consumption of traditional banks is around 26 TWh on running servers, 26 TWh on ATMs, and 87 TWh from an estimate of 600k+ branches worldwide. Totaling 139 TWh.”

      Not to mention banks impact on people’s lives. Limited purchasing power of the poor and soon to join them middle class… to purchase disposable products. Like the old tale of buying a expensive boot vs a cheap one.

      I’m all for less power usage … but seems like a witch hunt compared to what banking gets away w. It’s the the first time banks can point the finger at someone other then themselves.

      https://www.iyops.org/post/energy-consumption-cryptocurrency-vs-traditional-banks

      • clgoh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        A system used by everybody, and a system still used by a tiny fraction of the population are using a comparable amount of energy?

        • orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          hey, most of the crypto fans are all temporarily embarrassed billionaire libertarians anyway, so the bottom 99.5% can all eat shit and die

      • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        So it’s okay for crypto to consume more energy than banks because… Banks somehow limit the purchasing power of the poor?

        I don’t think I’m understanding your argument.