College student put on academic probation for using Grammarly: ‘AI violation’::Marley Stevens, a junior at the University of North Georgia, says she was wrongly accused of cheating.

  • j4k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I can make an offline AI say absolutely anything in any way shape or form I would like. It is a tool that improves efficiency in those smart enough to use it. There is nothing about it that is different than what a human can write.

    This is as stupid as all of the teachers that used to prevent us from using calculators for math 20 years ago. We should be encouraging everyone to adapt and adopt new technology that improves efficiency, and take on the real task of testing students with intelligent adaptive techniques. It is the antiquated mindset and academia that is the problem. Anyone that can’t adapt should be removed. When the student enters the workforce, their use of such efficiency improving tools is critical.

    • CurbsTickle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      You reminded me of my physics teacher in high school.

      I was very into my graphing calculator (TI-86), down to coding in assembly to make silly little games. My previous teacher made me show that the memory was cleared before any test.

      But his take? If I wrote a working application with all the formulas necessary to take the tests, then I put in the work to learn the material, and he didn’t care. I hadn’t done that, because I expected to wipe it, but after that I did and showed it to him (and gave him the code).

      Found out he would show off what I made for a few years before retiring, specifically to point out how I did something I found fun to learn.

      More teachers/school systems should be like that.

    • mriormro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Writing a paper isn’t about efficiency, it’s about forcing you to synthesize concepts and ideas such that they become more concrete in your mind. It, in itself, is the learning tool. It isn’t something to be checked off and chruned through like a widget you make at a factory.

      Your comment just sounds like you lack, I don’t know, care in regards to learning.