• A lot of the libcamera work done on Raspberry Pi boards is going towards improving the camera support on linux phones like the PinePhone, which is great!

        Aside from that, sadly a lot of people (including myself) are kind of fed up with Raspberry Pi, after they essentially abandoned their mission during Covid to please corporations, and are preparing to go public despite being a “charity”. Broadcom, their SoC supplier, also has left a sour taste in my mouth after their purchase and mass layoffs at VMWare.

        If they created a phone it would likely end up being scalped to death, and maybe pretty pricey compared to a PinePhone

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 months ago

          Aside from that, sadly a lot of people (including myself) are kind of fed up with Raspberry Pi, after they essentially abandoned their mission during Covid to please corporations

          Just out of curiosity, could you state what you think their mission was?

          (I’m just wondering if anybody even remembers their original original mission.)

          • AFAIK their original mission was along the lines of making computers accessible at a low price point, particularly targeting the education sector in parts of the world where computers weren’t very accessible or affordable. Comparable to the OLPC, but not on an individual basis

            I could be wrong though

    • Vilian@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      they don’t know to make a good android app, abd you want them to make an entire cellphone💀💀

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        They made an entire Linux-powered portable game system that’s revolutionizing Linux gaming at the moment…an embedded engineer is not the same skillset as an app developer. Not even close.

        • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          They made a device with a proprietary operating system and proprietary software. If you really want that, why not just use Android?

            • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Steam OS is proprietary.

              But Arch contains proprietary firmware, so technically it’s not fully free software either.

              • Titou@feddit.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                SteamOS is open source with some closed sources component. But most important think you seems not being able to understand is that Valve provide high support to Open source community, which means it wouldn’t be surprising if they decided to drop a open source phone.

                • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  SteamOS is open source with some closed sources component.

                  So it is not free software. It’s proprietary, unethical software that takes away your freedom. Just like Windows, Android, etc.

                  But most important think you seems not being able to understand is that Valve provide high support to Open source community, which means it wouldn’t be surprising if they decided to drop a open source phone.

                  By doing what? They only want to lock you in their proprietary platform. Most of heir software is proprietary, their games are proprietary and they restrict users with DRM. It’s a terrible company, which abuses their users. If Steam Deck contains proprietary software, why would their phone by anything different?

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t think you could go fast enough to catch Valve as they ran screaming from that idea.

      • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        Everything that matters is open source and upstreamed or on the way there. Haven’t kept up with the state of things but as far as I am aware you can already run a mainline kernel on the Deck. Would love to see an open phone you can easily run your own distribution on without jumping through hoops.

        But phones are hard. An x86 phone with decent battery life is even harder. But one can dream.

        • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          It’s certainly great that you can install any distro with mainline kernel on the deck (even if some things don’t work). But my point was that Valve doesn’t care about user freedom. Their OS and the Steam client are proprietary. If they made a GNU/Linux phone, there is no guarantee that you would be able to install a free distro and it almost certainly would come with non free software by default, which would be bad.

          Would love to see an open phone you can easily run your own distribution on without jumping through hoops.

          I think PinePhone Pro and Librem 5 can run a mainline kernel. It’s possible that some things won’t work, but a lot of stuff has been upstreamed. I’m curious if you can easily install an ARM build of Debian on them, but couldn’t find any information last time I looked it up.

          But phones are hard. An x86 phone with decent battery life is even harder. But one can dream.

          Oh yeah, that is the dream. I wonder how are the current mobile Ryzen CPUs. I’m curious if there is any that could work well in a phone.

          • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            There is a Debian spin for the Pinephone called Mobian. I ran that for quite a while with Phosh as the front end. It’s probably still installed on the device.

            What I hate about ARM is that you basically need a separate image for every device instead of one for everything like with x86.

            • lemmeee@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              I use Mobian with Phosh too! What I love about Mobian is that it’s just a small overlay on top of Debian. The project’s goal is literally to upstream everything into Debian and to stop existing. You can see that it doesn’t add a lot of packages: https://packages.mobian.org

              Yeah, you are right about ARM. It seems to be true about RISC-V as well. It’s so weird that so many people think those kinds of devices will be good for us. Sometimes I watch reviews of single board computers on YouTube and the reviewers never mention that the device can’t run mainline Linux. They can’t install Debian from debian.org on them. So instead they install some distro provided by the manufacturer and for some reason they are just fine with that. Raspberry PI is the same and almost nobody seems to be talking about this. So that’s why I’m not sure if you can install a normal distro on PinePhone Pro or Librem 5, even though they can run mainline Linux.

              Also ARM SoC manufacturers don’t seem to try to have upstream Linux support. So I think that’s why PinePhone uses a 2010 SoC (if I remember correctly) and Pro uses a 2016 SoC. It’s a bad platform.