The mods of all the major communities there remove comments criticism Hexbear and usually follow it up with a ban. It’s absolutely clear what is happening and it shouldn’t be allowed to continue.

  • woelkchen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    4 months ago

    Would you apply that logic to a neonazi white supremacist community on Lemmy.world?

      • woelkchen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        4 months ago

        you’re fine with sharing spaces with neonazi white supremacists.

        I’m not sharing a space with them when I block them, duh.

        • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          38
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          No, you’re putting a blanket over them and pretending they’re not there any more.

          They would still be active on the site and harming the community at large, you personally would just be blind to it.

          • sudneo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            4 months ago

            No, you’re putting a blanket over them and pretending they’re not there any more.

            Isn’t defederation the same thing? Users won’t disappear (and they can also create accounts elsewhere…).

            • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              4 months ago

              Blocked users or communities can still interact on the wider site and with you, you just won’t see them.

              Defederated instances are completely barred from doing so.

              It’s the difference between plugging your ears when someone else speaks vs locking them out of your house and not letting them get close.

              • sudneo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                4 months ago

                Ok, but it’s the same thing from the perspective of all the people on an instance vs from the perspective of an individual. Those people are still there, creating posts etc., and they can easily move on other instances if they want too.

                It’s just a “bigger blanket”, but the concept is essentially the same, with the plus that more people are “covered” and the minus that someone might be affected against their will.

                Either way, it doesn’t solve the problem, it just masks it for the members of an instance. Why would it be a fundamentally better solution in this particular instance?

          • woelkchen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            25
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Have your instance block individual communities and users then.

            Blocking entire big-tent instances is “harming the community at large”.

            PS: Have fun on my block list. I’m not discussing any longer with someone who says I’m a neonazi sympathizer.