At a recent all-hands meeting, Google search head Prabhakar Raghavan told employees that the world is changing and they have to adjust.

  • eleitl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Things definitely changed. 15-20 years ago you actually got good search results instead of unusable crap we get today.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I remember it already was, but everybody knew it was, so search engines were the brute force approach. The intelligent way was to use web directories and to ask friends.

        The enshittification of the web is just one aspect of the enshittification of humanity.

    • mesamune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 months ago

      True their competition is actually getting much better whereas they just throw BS at you nowadays. It’s unfortunate but Google is no longer my go-to for searching.

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        The issue is that there are 1000 spam sites heavily optimized specifically to exploit Google’s algorithm for every legitimate site. Merely by not being the primary focus of SEO, alternatives have a pretty hefty advantage.

    • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I was getting decent results up until about a month ago (though partly because I have an extension to block sponsored links and arranges the page as it used to appear around 2010). It was like they just flipped a switch from “good” to “shitty.” Can’t even find images I would grab off the first page when repeating a search from history, now. It seemed to correlate almost exactly with when it started to generate blurbs through AI at the top instead of just summarizing one of the pages in the top links.

    • Num10ck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      i wonder what will replace it… maybe some way of AI to figure out which websites are deemed good in the eyes of actual human users, and then human users opting into sharing such score charts with each other?

      • eleitl@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Gen AI is a net negative for the moment, since the deluge of generated low-quality content outweighs convenience of topical results generated by LLMs with natural language queries.

  • Hillmarsh@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Used to get about 200+ pages of search results. Now it’s about 30 actual results and half of them are fake / malicious / useless. Google as a company was once an innovator, but is now mostly a barrier to any kind of progress or improvement.

  • DevCat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Wearing a hoodie with the words “We use Math” on the front, Google search boss Prabhakar Raghavan had an important message for employees at an all-hands meeting last month. But he first wanted them to settle in and get comfortable.

    Raghavan said Google’s digital ad business had become “the envy of the world.” He noted that over the last three years, annual revenue has grown by more than $100 billion, exceeding Starbucks, Mazda and TikTok combined.

    Does this mean you’ll be using math to pay them more for producing more? (have to add /s)

  • Nachorella@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    Until we have a world that recognises that the internet is now a right and governments should be subsidising search and other services so that they don’t turn into useless ad delivery systems - I’m ok paying for Kagi.

  • funn@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    7 months ago

    It’s so bad that I actively try to avoid certain top sites in google search results, especially when I am searching for review on product

    • micka190@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      There are uBlock Origin filters that exist purely to filter out certain SEO spam sites from search results. I’ve been using this one to filter out sites that basically copy/paste answers from popular dev sites that just completely clutter Google search results. I used to have one that included things like W3 Schools and Quora but I can’t find it anymore, unfortunately.

  • thefactremains@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Coming from the same guy who killed Google search according to this article.

    Coincidentally just published yesterday…

    Which contains an almost identical quote from Nick Fox (Google VP of search in 2019)

    Fox added that all three of them were responsible for search, that search was “the revenue engine of the company,” and that bartering with the ads and finance teams was potentially “the new reality of their jobs.”

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    remember all those adorable puff piece articles about the adult playgrounds for google employees?

  • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    100 hour weeks to 120 hour weeks.

    I hope those engineers are getting double bonus equity or something. 100 hour weeks is “you live in the office and all you do is work”. I’ve done 100 hour weeks in my game crunch days. It’s impossible to maintain a personal life.

    I cannot imagine anyone being productive at 120 hour weeks. WTF is this? North Korea?!

    • RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      100 hour weeks are not productive either. That’s a mean 14 hours 7 days a week. You cannot stay productive that long and even less so without a single day off. You’ll produce shit 4 hours per day and use the first hour of the next just to clean it up.

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Oh 100%. 100 hour work weeks are absolutely insane and clear productivity theatre. To then pretend that adding an extra 20 hours will do more. Man what a waste.

  • Boiglenoight@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    7 months ago

    I like Gemini. It’s easily the best AI for rewriting things for social media that reflects my intent while sounding somewhat like me.