Two men is two more than the bears that wrote in, so it’s a gamble that bears are less likely to cause her harm.
Anyhow, she doesn’t generalize it to all men, so my brother why are you picking up a hat that doesn’t suit you? That’s sort of her goal, she’s being inflammatory so that the angry responses can prove her right.
If she wants to go poke at bears in a forest, then god speed and I hope she takes a rifle. I’ll stay home chilling and watching netflix.
I don’t think the point is that it’s ok. More like “don’t feed the troll”, as there isn’t a real conversation to be had with someone looking to cause drama.
Two men is two more than the bears that wrote in, so it’s a gamble that bears are less likely to cause her harm.
Anyhow, she doesn’t generalize it to all men, so my brother why are you picking up a hat that doesn’t suit you? That’s sort of her goal, she’s being inflammatory so that the angry responses can prove her right.
If she wants to go poke at bears in a forest, then god speed and I hope she takes a rifle. I’ll stay home chilling and watching netflix.
So you fully acknowledge thats shes just being a troll?
Proving a point isn’t trolling.
… but being purposefully inflammatory is basically the definition of trolling.
Op eds are purposefully inflammatory all the time and have been for decades. Did op eds invent trolling? Here’s a few I found:
I mean, kinda yeah?
Okay, then you have nothing to complain about since this is normal in media outlets.
She is 100% generalizing all men my guy
So…if I say something deliberately misogynistic, and then say it’s ok I only said it to prove I was right, that’s ok?
:(
I don’t think the point is that it’s ok. More like “don’t feed the troll”, as there isn’t a real conversation to be had with someone looking to cause drama.