• cron@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 months ago

    Interestingly, this CPU performs noticeably better under Linux than under Windows 11

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Microshit wasting money ruining windows and spending no cash on optimization. Corpo leadership for ya in today’s America.

      Parasites just looting.

      • Toribor@corndog.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        No need to optimize when you can just push people to upgrade their hardware more frequently so you make fat stacks of cash from OEM’s.

  • hackerwacker@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Why don’t they reverse the axis on the “less if better” graphs so you don’t have to look at the note on every graph…

  • Sabin10@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    I read an article recently comparing w10 and w11 performance and the numbers were basically the same as this. No gamer should be running w11.

  • linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    So many f****** ads I gave my cell phone cancer.

    TMA:DR

    When taking the geometric mean of 73 benchmarks run for this comparison, upgrading from the Ryzen 9 7950X to 9950X on Ubuntu 24.04 LTS yielded a 14% generational improvement with this set of cross-platform applications/benchmarks while under Windows 11 was a 10% generational improvement. The raw performance of Ubuntu Linux on the AMD Ryzen processors also was greater overall to the extent of the Ryzen 9 7950X to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS nearly matching the Ryzen 9 9950X on Microsoft Windows 11.