Yeah, I think massive chemical batteries for storing excess electricity to facilitate a contrived green energy market is a bad idea.

    • FaceDeer@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yes, and? Measuring an energy storage facility in terms of power is not a good idea.

      If you asked someone how big a water tank was and they said “five liters per second”, would that be useful?

      • Bad_Engineering@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It would be very useful if you were asking the right question. The storage facility from the article has a 750 MW storage capacity (energy) which it can deliver at a max output (power) of 3000 MW/hr Power plant and storage facility capacities are measured in MW since what they are intended to do is supply power at a steady rate. Who cares if you can store a billion TW of power if you can only output it at 5mW/h. It does no good if you can’t get it out. Supply is what we really care about here.

        • xionzui@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          True to your name, you’re using those backwards. You’re thinking of MW hours per hour, or just MW. Put differently, MW is a rate, MWh is a quantity.