Actually no, mostly education and raising people in a world that doesnt endorse having kids everywhere.
Example: In the developed countries we are still incentivizing families with kids. Why the fuck would we do that in a current environmental crisis?
We should’ve started this in the 50-60’s and now we’d have waaay less cars to pollute for example.
But instead only a hint of a mention of overpopulation being an actual issue is insulting to people because “god damn, having kids and eating meat is my god given right” - thought 9 billion people.
Developed countries, through education and economic realities, generally have children at or below the replacement rate. Most of their growth comes from immigration from other countries with much higher birth rates.
The incentives you’re talking about are there to stabilize the population so there isn’t more people in nursing homes than there are propping up the economy taking care of those people. It’s a tough situation, and with the capitalist systems in place and a lack of long promised automation in many industries, it’s worrying for everyone involved.
So really it’s already working the way you want, largely. If you want something more dramatic you need to find another lever, and at the same time you need to balance your goal with the dropping population in the workforce so you can afford to care for the elderly.
Saying overpopulation is an issue is the most meaningless statement. What do you propose we DO about it? Sterilize the population? Yeah, I went through your history because I was curious if I was talking to a kid and sure enough there is no doubt about it now
How about controlling the amount of people and thus not being in a constant state of threat?
Would help the climate too. We make the absolute dumbest civilization ever
Ah yes, the Thanos solution
I shudder to think what the answer to this will be, but… How do you propose this should be done?
Eugenics. The crowd beating this drum always reinvents eugenics with a new mask.
Actually no, mostly education and raising people in a world that doesnt endorse having kids everywhere.
Example: In the developed countries we are still incentivizing families with kids. Why the fuck would we do that in a current environmental crisis? We should’ve started this in the 50-60’s and now we’d have waaay less cars to pollute for example.
But instead only a hint of a mention of overpopulation being an actual issue is insulting to people because “god damn, having kids and eating meat is my god given right” - thought 9 billion people.
Developed countries, through education and economic realities, generally have children at or below the replacement rate. Most of their growth comes from immigration from other countries with much higher birth rates.
The incentives you’re talking about are there to stabilize the population so there isn’t more people in nursing homes than there are propping up the economy taking care of those people. It’s a tough situation, and with the capitalist systems in place and a lack of long promised automation in many industries, it’s worrying for everyone involved.
So really it’s already working the way you want, largely. If you want something more dramatic you need to find another lever, and at the same time you need to balance your goal with the dropping population in the workforce so you can afford to care for the elderly.
Free access to contraceptives, proper sex education, and protecting abortion rights would go a long way to reducing the birth rate.
You're a kid aren't you? Holy shit. I wish I had half your confidence when dishing out an opinion.
You’re right. Overpopulation is not an issue because your feelings tell you so.
Also, I didn’t mean to make you so upset that you’re going through my comment history.
Saying overpopulation is an issue is the most meaningless statement. What do you propose we DO about it? Sterilize the population? Yeah, I went through your history because I was curious if I was talking to a kid and sure enough there is no doubt about it now