• fodor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    All of the examples are commercial products. The author doesn’t know or doesn’t realize that this is a capitalist problem. Of course, there is bloat in some open source projects. But nothing like what is described in those examples.

    And I don’t think you can avoid that if you’re a capitalist. You make money by adding features that maybe nobody wants. And you need to keep doing something new. Maintenance doesn’t make you any money.

    So this looks like AI plus capitalism.

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Sometimes, I feel like writers know that it’s capitalism, but they don’t want to actually call the problem what it is, for fear of scaring off people who would react badly to it. I think there’s probably a place for this kind of oblique rhetoric, but I agree with you that progress is unlikely if we continue pussyfooting around the problem

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      “Open source” is not contradictory to “capitalist”, just involves a fair bit of industry alliances and\or freeloading.

      • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        “Open source” was literally invented to make Free software palatable to capitol.