• mudkip@lemdro.idOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    13 days ago

    It references “solarium” icons which was the rumored codename of liquid glass!

  • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    13 days ago

    This is like right clicking on a website and going view source and then pretending like they forgot to hide their code. It’s a complete nothing.

    • mudkip@lemdro.idOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      13 days ago

      Well it’s not like clicking view source, it is clicking view source. But yes, they forgot to hide their code.

      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        13 days ago

        But yes, they forgot to hide their code.

        But they don’t need to hide their code because there’s nothing to hide.

        • mudkip@lemdro.idOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          13 days ago

          Then how do you explain the fact that they removed it a few hours after it was posted? 🤡

          • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            13 days ago

            Because of people like you thinking they fucked up and spreading FUD?

            If you knew anything about software development and the internet you would understand that there was no issue here. It’s all client side code. It’s not hiding any secrets, it’s not stuff that is any use to anyone.

            • mudkip@lemdro.idOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              13 days ago

              Not about client-side vs server-side. It’s unminified source code containing comments, links to internal tickets and private repositories. That’s the exact reason it’s meant to be stripped at build time, not because of FUD but because it’s a legitimate risk.

              • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                13 days ago

                You know you can un-minify code, don’t you? Minifying it doesn’t encrypt it. The links to internal tickets and private repositories would still be there even if they minify it.

                Links to internal tickets and repos aren’t a security issue btw.

                • mudkip@lemdro.idOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  Minifying is a one way process and once it’s done, you lose the names of all variables and functions. And no, they wouldn’t be present because comments are stripped.

                • bookmeat@lemmynsfw.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  No, this is food for exploit-searching AI. Private comments and tickets, etc is what they use to leverage targeted attacks.