No, you can’t prove that something never happens or that something doesn’t exist. You can sometimes prove something that contradicts the existence of something, but that’s not proving that the thing itself doesn’t exist, because it’s epistemologically not possible
You made a typo in your original comment
I can prove that the Christian God doesn’t exist
No worries, I appreciate your apology
I don’t know which kinds of AIs you’ve worked on but my description (although using the incorrect terms) is certainly valid. I’ve described how GANs work, I’m not pulling this out of thin air 🤷♂️
The generative network generates candidates while the discriminative network evaluates them. The contest operates in terms of data distributions. Typically, the generative network learns to map from a latent space to a data distribution of interest, while the discriminative network distinguishes candidates produced by the generator from the true data distribution. The generative network’s training objective is to increase the error rate of the discriminative network (i.e., “fool” the discriminator network by producing novel candidates that the discriminator thinks are not synthesized (are part of the true data distribution)).
So yes, whichever method you design which allows the product of an AI to be detected can be used by a discriminative network for a GAN, which defeats the purpose of designing the method to begin with
You don’t understand that tech; when making an AI model, you do code both a generator of whatever it is you want to make, as well as a “detector” which tells you whether or not the result is convincing.
Then you change the genertor slightly based of the results of the “detector”
You do that a few million times and then you have a correct AI model, the quality of which is dependant on both the quantity of training and the “detector”.
If someone comes up with a really strong “detector”, they will do work as intended for a few days/weeks, and then AIs will come on the market which will be able to fool the detector
It’s a monarchy
Who’s the fox tho
You are prompted what app to use when trying to do something, yes. If you click a link in an app for the first time, it will ask you what browser to open it into
Not with mullvad it won’t
Just adware and spyware
Just checked it, it doesn’t seem to be the case
When you save website passwords, the Primary Password feature encrypts them before storing them on your computer
How about when using a primary password?
If it’s a news agency they could sign it. Great.
But then it hinders the denouncing of police violence, whistleblowing, and allows corporations to sign their claims while what regular people record will be assumed to be false
Edit: reporting can also be done as a second hand account, reposting videos/photos already in circulation, meaning that either a news company will sign those second hand recordings at the risk of validating AI content, or only their own corporate recordings will be used.
No one wins in any case
Get a pair of Viture glasses then, it’s about $500
Also qbittorrent is open source, with no crap like bloat etc, that is usually found with other torrent clients
I love how every photo of this thing is right in front of the subject. Just tilt their head 30° and it will look like comical googly eyes
Why are you simping so hard for corps 💀
Also it’s too heavy to wear comfortably for long sessions
Ah sorry I misunderstood your comment