What performance threshold should that be? 10%? So 140,000 manual checks of CS:GO players? 1% is still 14,000. How are you going to check those people - go to their houses? If they don’t let you in just ban them? What about people who install cheats that allow them to perform as well as someone in the top 2% but not top 1%? They have a free ride?
It’s not possible to catch all cheats, but pure server-side cheat detection is basically worthless.
Cool but this started with you saying anti chest should be server side, not that it should not be kernel level.
And it’s still used together with client side cheat detection.
It doesn’t have to extinguish 99% of cheaters, but if it affects 1% of legitimate players that’s a big problem. Good luck tuning your ML to have a less than 1% false positive rate while still doing anything.
Client side anti-cheat has more data than server-side, because that is where the player’s actual screen, mouse and keyboard are.
The cheat only uses data available on the client - obviously - so the extra data about game state on the server is irrelevant.
“ML” is also not relevant. It doesn’t make the server any more able to make up for the data it doesn’t have. It only forces cheats to try and make realistic inputs, which they already do. And it ends up meaning that you don’t understand the decisions your anti-cheat model is making, so the inevitable false positives will cause a stink because you can’t justify them.
How do you tell the difference between someone with a good aimbot (that simulates real input) and someone who’s just really good?
You can’t (server side).
How can you implement server-side anti-cheat?
I get annoyed just seeing all of these spelled out.
Speed is an absolute requirement for a launcher, and if one of the search providers is taking too long it needs to be removed until its speed makes it usable. There’s no way I want to wait for web results if they take between 1 and 10 seconds. The number of local results should always be such that it can be held in memory without being a burden, and return in an imperceptible amount of time.
Do the other effects for switching desktops, like the default slide, not accomplish the same thing? I also find that having no animation makes it harder to keep track of where things are, but just have the sliding one
Weirdly this happens on my work laptop (x11) but not any other Linux machine I’ve used including all the Wayland ones. I assume it’s due to video drivers.
Just the word syntax? Sure. You teach coding at first by example, not from first principles. At some point, explaining the concepts helps in the teaching but not at first.
That sounds like a level of detail it is not necessarily useful to go into with most people. I never experienced anyone non-technical complaining about cloud products, so it would just be proselytising about what to me is a hobby/passion project.
(Not that I’m big into self hosting, but to the extent I am)
CS has VAC which can issue VAC bans - unless something’s changed. They may also get volunteers to assess stuff idk.