![](https://media.kbin.social/media/8f/70/8f70c67b18a01b6d2e9d154e34b9ad53e4197fbe00639224e365798aa61b07f3.png)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
You’re missing 1.5: Make it impossible for people who every professional medical association of good repute says said medication help, get the medication by prescription.
You’re missing 1.5: Make it impossible for people who every professional medical association of good repute says said medication help, get the medication by prescription.
You don’t think nearly 1/6th is statistically significant? What’s the lower bound on significance as you see things?
To be clear, it’s obviously dumb for their generative system to be overrepresenting turbans like this, although it’s likely to be a bias in the inputs rather than something the system came up with itself, I just think that 5% is generally enough to be considered significant and calling three times that not significant confuses me.
Why does he look like Dollar General Seth Meyers?
So for the 99% there is an abolishment of private property, leaving only personal property and public property, everyone has an equal share, and the state has been dissolved?
Because if not, at least one of us doesn’t understand communism. It’s entirely possible we both don’t. Would you be willing to clarify the term as you understand it?
My mom introduced me to Napster. So at this point, it would be a family tradition.
Distribution of money and power is a facet of society.
I mean, not everyone agrees what the problems are. We can’t even approach talking about solutions until we settle on the problems. And that problem seems to be getting worse.
Yeah, the wiki is a big help, as is being aware that any item that has ‘Material’ in the list of traits when you mouse over it, can be brought to the guide, when you talk to him one of the options is ‘crafting’, and the empty blue box in that menu can have said items dropped into it for a list of all recipes using it, along with what workstation it takes.
Doesn’t seem to be on the list yet:
Terraria.
I have hundreds of hours on my steam account, and I’m pretty sure it’s actually thousands. It’s a great game, and it’s been updated so much since it released. When you could buy and hold gift copies of steam, I used to regularly buy new copies to hang on to to hand out to people; I’ve probably gotten ten people into it. Currently doing a modded master playthrough with my family and having a great time.
If anyone doing an arms race wins at AGI literally everyone gets mulched, so I hope nobody who is, does.
It’s in the primary. 100% vote uncommitted in the primary, Biden is the democratic nominee and this won’t swing it. Then absolutely vote Biden in November, because of the aforementioned sucking worse, with dry mouth and teeth.
What do you mean when you say “true AI”? The question isn’t answerable as asked, because those words could mean a great many things.
Unpack this, please? What is that agenda? How are trans people and feminists being used to push it? What does skin deep “support” in the form of lip service have to do with it?
I’m not hearing how trans people fit into this. You know the Nazis killed a lot of trans people and the book burnings included the research of the time, right?
It does not help that NATO loves weaponising trans people for neoliberal white power agenda.
Yeah like the other respondent I am absolutely going to request that you unpack this.
Alternative perspective: many “traditional” things are in fact bad. Not everything, but many things, and we should dump those things.
You might get some value from Stephen Baxter’s Manifold series; while they aren’t central to what you’re asking for they definitely deal with humanity coping with a hostile universe. Heinlein wrote a couple of short stories set on a generation ship, although I can’t bring the titles to mind. Accelerando takes place in many manufactured settings, rarely earth like (past the first major part). Brin and Benford’s Heart of the Comet may also point in the direction you want.
I get a sense about people.
Okay, but are you a lawyer?
I would love to see research data pointing either way re #1, although it would be incredibly difficult to do so ethically, verging on impossible. For #2, people have extracted originals or near-originals of inputs to the algorithms. AI generated stuff - plagiarism machine generated stuff, runs the risk of effectively revictimizing people who were already abused to get said inputs.
It’s an ugly situation all around, and unfortunately I don’t know that much can be done about it beyond not demonizing people who have such drives, who have not offended, so that seeking therapy for the condition doesn’t screw them over. Ensuring that people are damned if they do and damned if they don’t seems to pretty reliably produce worse outcomes.