New evidence confirms COVID-19 vaccines are overwhelmingly safe::More than 38 million COVID-19 vaccine doses have been administered in Ontario as of Oct. 8, with 23,002 reports of adverse reactions, an incidence of 0.06 per cent, Public Health Ontario says

    • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I guess whatever it takes to convince the skeptics. Though I figure nothing will convince them once they've made up their mind.

      • Player2@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Cannot use logic to convince someone whose argument isn't logical in the first place

        • darkdemize@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 months ago

          I've always preferred it phrased as "You can't reason someone out of a position they didn't reason themselves into," but same energy.

      • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Because it's obvious to them that it's safe and yet, due to the idiots in the population, they still had to do a study to "prove" what they already knew.

        Fact is, mRNA isn't actually new. It's been used as a treatment for some things for nearly two decades before COVID. The remarkable part of the COVID vaccine is the speed at which they were able to adapt the tech to the new threat and produce a viable non-sterilizing vaccine from it. That shouldn't imply that research into a COVID vaccine has stopped, there may be a better vaccine that's possible, and I'm sure someone is working on that and I thank them for their work. The fact is mRNA was proven to be safe more than a decade before COVID-19 was a thing.

        The main issue that the public has with it is that mRNA as a treatment or vaccine is relatively unused. The diseases/disorders that have utilized mRNA for treatment aren't the most common, and unless you were presented with mRNA treatment options if you're in the small group of people with the diagnosis that has an mRNA treatment option, it would be entirely new; and that describes the vast majority of people.

        The information about it is out there, but Facebook research says that this is "brand new experimental technology" that has unpredictable outcomes, creating FUD, which is entirely based on nothing, because it's not unpredictable and it's not experimental. It's true that it hasn't been used in this application yet (at the time), and that the COVID vaccine was the first to use the technology for that purpose, but it's hardly new/untested/experimental in any way, shape, or form. The doctors and researchers who developed the vaccine did their due diligence, and ran test groups before releasing the vaccine to the widespread population. This was done on an accelerated timeline than what is typical, but it was still done. They followed procedure. The only thing that could be argued that was missing was a long term study to show any lasting effects over years, which they simply didn't have time for; but all evidence from the existing use of mRNA for treatments indicates that's also going to result in no significant issues as well.

        They did everything right and some portion of the population screamed bloody murder about it, meanwhile the delivery method was tried and tested, and already proven to be safe, yet they had to do yet another study to affirm what they already knew. For anyone who is aware of what medical R&D is doing and what standards they are held to, the fact that it was safe wasn't even in question, but because some Facebook "researchers" decided it wasn't with no evidence, there had to be additional and unnecessary work done to "prove" something that was already known to be true.

        Hence, groan.

  • k110111@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Guys the reason this study is important is because covid vaccines used revolutionary technology, they were the first to use mRNA based protein. If you remember we sequenced its genome within 40 days the making the vaccine was considerably easy. This is the main reason it took only 2 years for the vaccine to be made compared to years of development for other vaccines.

    • Match!!@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      It also means that, with this new vaccine technology, we can develop vaccines faster and faster

    • darth_tiktaalik@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      Sometimes the goalposts are moved and merged with goalposts from other conspiracy theories.

      When 5g wasn't the end of humanity it became the trigger for a zombie virus…hidden in the vaccine!

      Wonder what third thing will become the new first domino to knock over the 5g and vaccine dominoes.

      • fubo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 months ago

        Conspiracism is not truth-tracking. It's rooted in an emotional response to feelings of lack of control. By saying false things and getting away with it, the conspiracist feels greater control over their life. "You can't stop me from lying, therefore I have power."

        Hence why authoritarians love conspiracism: authoritarianism promises that if you repeat the doctrine and smash the Leader's designated enemies (the "conspiracy"), you will regain the control that was taken from you. This also illustrates why "left" authoritarianism (e.g. Stalinism, Maoism) is really rightist: it does not actually offer freedom or equality, but rather rigid hierarchy and escalating falsehood and cruelty.

        If you follow Nazism, Stalin, Hamas, Trump, or Netanyahu and smash the designated enemies who the Leader tells you have been conspiring against your nation … you do not get freedom, you just eventually become the next enemy to be smashed. Of course really your Leader has built up the enemy to threaten you: authoritarians never seek peace, because peace removes the need to fear and hate.

        (None of this is new. Orwell and Sartre both described it in the 1940s.)

        • SCB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          This kind of inappropriately equates conspiracy theories and conservatism but I assure you that the anti-GMO, 9/11 Truther, and even the original vaccine pushback were not from the right

          There's even crossover. The New Age/NESARA movement has a pipeline directly into Qanon, a movement at opposite views to NA stuff.

  • madcaesar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    I'm fully pro vaccine and I'm happy for these studies. Nothing wrong about getting more data and confirming or revisiting things based on said results.

    Science is not afraid of being double checked.

  • AAA@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    I didn't need a study for that. I mean we vaccinated ones are still pretty much alive, despite all the warnings of the dum-dums.

  • kandoh@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    There was a 50/50 split in the US Senate when the vaccine came out. Every member of that group was vaccinated. They were the first members of the population to be vaccinated. If any of the ancient senators had died, the balance of power would have shifted in a huge way.

    • Overzeetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      I've seen enough bridge failures to know that they're all dangerous. You can't fool me - I'd rather drive through a river than take one of your so-called "safe" bridges. At least in my truck I'm in control, and my F150 with these snazzy AT tires and my belief in God can get me further than some steel and concrete "bridge" that some engineer in a lab cooked up.

  • sneezymrmilo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    In other news water is wet. Never had any doubt although you can't use science to convince antivaxers because they just don't care about facts or logic.

  • Dazawassa@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Genuinely impressive how a vaccine made under the conditions and time constraints COVID faced is so effective.

    • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      That's because most of the groundwork in developing mrna vaccines had already been done for years and years. This wasn't "how do we invent a vaccine for covid?", this was "how do we adapt this proven, well-understood vaccine tech so that it works for covid just like it does for the ebola virus that we originally developed it for?"

      • OminousOrange@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        There was also a large amount of money thrown at developing the vaccine because of the virus' significant economic impacts.

        • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          it's wild because it was a whole bunch of our money but somehow the vaccine developed with all of our money is still privately owned

    • WuTang @lemmy.ninja
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Genuinely impressive how a vaccine made under the conditions and time constraints COVID faced is so effective.

      Come ON! This doesn't say the vaccine - which one? - is effective but would have low adverse effects.

      Not astonished that you put people against this experimental product in the case of anti-vax despite them being vaccinated for other stuff.

  • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Sweet

    I just saw yet another Tim pool twitter thread with people talking about wanting assault vaccines be made illegal