“Every single Monday was called ‘AI Monday,’” Vaughan said, with his mandate for staff that they could work only on AI. “You couldn’t have customer calls; you couldn’t work on budgets; you had to only work on AI projects.” He said this happened across the board, not just for tech workers, but also for sales, marketing, and everybody else at IgniteTech. “That culture needed to be built. That was the key.”

  • melfie@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    2 months ago

    A recent MIT report indicates that 95% of generative AI pilots fail to deliver measurable returns on investment, highlighting significant challenges in successfully implementing AI in businesses

    CEOs:

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    2 months ago

    Because it had nothing to do with AI

    It was an excuse to slash the workforce with relatively little backlash.

  • Doorknob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    2 months ago

    Nota bene: Not just laid off, replaced. With other people.

    Basically spent a ton of money and talent and business disruption to turn over 80% of his workforce for shits and gigs.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 months ago

    The question I put to management is “What do you want me to use AI for?”

    I can’t get a consistent answer. Lots of stuff unrelated to my job duties. “Well, it’s so easy to make Facebook ads!” - “You know that’s not a thing I do, right?”

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      They don’t have an answer because they don’t know either. They’ve bought into the idea, and invested trillions, and now they’re all hoping to just churn the cream until it turns into something else, but they have no idea what it will be, or how to use it.

      They’re just hoping some minion finally figures out a profitable model, so they can claim it as their own, give him a nominal raise and a nice office, and they can go make trillions off his idea.

  • jaybone@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 months ago

    If this dickhead is so smart, why does he even need a staff? I’m sure he can go start a company all by himself with just AI to work for him.

  • Absurdly Stupid @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    He REALLY hates paying employees and wants their pennies in his treasure horde, we get it.

    He will be shocked when he discovers the shareholders don’t want to pay him, either. He’ll be like “what?!?! AI doing MY job? This is a travesty!” and then they will have robot security drag him out of the building screaming.

  • kadu@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is a paid promotion. Its one of the ones you pay an extra $1000 and they hide the sponsored tag.

  • deathbird@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    A company so small it doesn’t even have a Wikipedia page. No discernible products.

    Any poly market bets on how long this company actually lasts?

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      Their website barely even works it honestly looks like a scam organisation. I can’t find any description of what it is that they actually do which makes me believe that they don’t do anything.

  • Tattorack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 months ago

    “I am bad at managing my finances, and eventually need to get bailed out by the government, or end up next to the homeless guy I used to make fun of”.

    • This guy.
  • bastien@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 months ago

    This reads like a very weird AI circlejerk. They repeatedly mention that AI is the solution every company should adopt, but fail to provide a single example of succesful application. And I mean a how not a reult. They say ‘company X KPI are this % better thanks to AI’, but not how they applied it. Just talk of AI mindset, and ‘culture’ but I would have liked to understand what exactly it was used for (like agents, chatbots, automation of something in particular). It just reads like a lot of patting in the back and hot air so far, which is a pity because I would be interested in reading about real life cases of successful AI implementaiom

    • Kay Ohtie@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 months ago

      I used to joke that the CEO of my former employer must subscribe to some magazine called “CEO Weekly” in which they must periodically mention, in a similar “no examples of usage, just KPIs” manner, webchat. She would always forget about it promptly and then random number of weeks later bug my boss again.

      I told him if they want me to come up with how they can use webchat and be their solutions designer they need to double my salary. $60k USD was not enough for being a tier 3 systems admin, a fax and telephony specialist, and figuring out their use cases for them just to check a box that says “we have it!”

    • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      They say ‘company X KPI are this % better thanks to AI’

      They asked an LLM for the KPIs and it helpfully made up the figures they wanted to see.

      Which became a self fulfilling prophecy once they showed those awesome “results” to the investors.

      Of course it’ll all come crashing down once the investors ask for a return on their investment and there are no more new investors to support the pyramid, but by that point someone (probably not the brainrotten CEOs, who are drinking their own coolaid) will be far away with the money in a Cayman Islands bank account…

    • Bleys@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      From the article:

      Vaughan was surprised to find it was often the technical staff, not marketing or sales, who dug in their heels. They were the “most resistant,” he said, voicing various concerns about what the AI couldn’t do, rather than focusing on what it could. The marketing and salespeople were enthused by the possibilities of working with these new tools, he added.

      Not surprising the people with technical skills that aren’t actually replaceable by LLMs would be against forced AI adoption. Good luck maintaining a code base created with vibe coding. Meanwhile the CEO probably looks at ChatGPT and realizes it could basically do everything he already does (write emails and make high level decisions without actually having to worry about their implementation) and then incorrectly thinks it’s the case for everyone else.

      • Atropos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I deal with this at work. Two engineers love AI, myself and the other engineer hate it. We’re mechanical. It’s funny when a material standard doesn’t exist…

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Prediction markets have outperformed CEOs for decades and still haven’t replaced them, for the same reason WfH hasn’t replaced offices. Everything is a monopoly or oligopoly now, with no need to efficiently maximize profits. It’s entirely a matter of control.