• slaacaa@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    8 months ago

    just one more slop bro. I promise bro just one more slop and it’ll fix everything bro. bro, just one more slop. please just one more, one more slop and we can fix this whole problem bro, bro cmon just give me one more slop i promise bro, bro bro please! just need one more slop

  • Tharkys@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    8 months ago

    “[It’s] extremely hurtful, frankly, and I think we’ve done a lot of damage,” he said.

    Weird, I didn’t know both Jensen and I felt the same way about AI.

    • zEKEfrieD@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      “It’s not helpful. It’s not helpful to people. It’s not helpful to the industry. It’s not helpful to society. It’s not helpful to the governments,”

  • Boiglenoight@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    8 months ago

    According to Huang, considering the potential existential risks of unleashing AI on society may do more harm than good. “It’s not helpful. It’s not helpful to people. It’s not helpful to the industry. It’s not helpful to society. It’s not helpful to the governments,” he said. He particularly took issue with other people in the industry going to the government and asking for regulation and mandatory safeguards. “You have to ask yourself, you know, what is the purpose of that narrative and what are their intentions,” he asked rhetorically. “Why are they talking to governments about these things to create regulations to suffocate startups?”

    You don’t have to ask yourself that because it’s common sense. He’s being disingenuous about AI’s potential to harm society, and stating the intent is to suffocate startups…they’re not making a new instant messaging client. I want to smack him upside the head.

  • Ghostwurm@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s destroying our economy, our ecology, our politics, our society. What’s not to like?

    • Kaz@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Mostly so that lonely losers can chat to a bot, have an AI partner or generate garbage.

      Over 40% of the use is for completely stupid things and it seems those users have zero issues burning our planet so they can do dumb shit.

  • AlexLost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    8 months ago

    Why? It totally sucks and is ruining the world in almost every corner. Fuck AI with a sharp stick.

  • anon_8675309@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    8 months ago

    People: AI is cool, I could use it to get my work done faster.

    Billionaires: Fuck you, we’ll just replace you completely.

    But yeah, let’s stop complaining.

  • leriotdelac@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    I like LLMs and use them a lot for boring task. It’s a nice tool, but I’d love to see it being marketed as such, and not as a panacea or a catastrophe. And gosh, I’d love people to stop shoving it down people’s throats. No, Adobe, I don’t need a summary, and I see it’s a long document, stop wasting time and resources…

  • realitista@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 months ago

    I would have a lot less negativity around AI if the mag 7 and all AI companies agreed to sign a contract to be nationalized once they have automated a significant amount of jobs, with their profits to be used for a national basic income. I would be much more positive in that case, Jensen. Give it some thought.