• jaybone@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    9 days ago

    Zuck has kissed the ring. He will be fine. You can all stop worrying about him now. Barbecue sauce.

    • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 days ago

      That’s just a news bite. He or yuckbook has never ever really been in trouble. It’s vital tool for global surveillance.

      Remember Cambridge analytica?rohingya genocide? and other countless controversies?

  • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    9 days ago

    Fuck Facebook and also this is clearly morphing into a moral panic about social media in a way that is extremely unproductive, dangerous and ultimately a distraction from the actual issues at hand.

    • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Not sure if you’re trying to argue that modern social media is a good thing… Because it really isn’t. All of these platforms are actively detrimental to our mental health and destabilizing society. All of them have their billionaire owners manipulating the algorithms to maximize what they want you to see and minimize opposing views, if not outright removing them (like Meta is doing with the ICE List currently).

      • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        All of these platforms are actively detrimental to our mental health and destabilizing society.

        According to you? How do you feel about the TikTok takeover? Anxiously awaiting the same for Lemmy?

        • Taldan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          We have study after study showing various prominent social media platforms are bad for mental health, so that part feels pretty clear

          Destabilizing society is a harder one to show, but I’d argue Cambridge Analytica, and similar programs are what got Trump elected in 2016. Social media played a very interesting part in elections in the Philippines as well, due to the inability for most to fact check any information shared on social media (Meta/Facebook provided cell service for free only to their platforms)

          It’s undeniable that large numbers of bots are used to shape public perception of topics. Several talks at Black Hat and Defcon have investigated specific attack chains used, and how sock puppets are used to spread specific misinformation

          Given those factors, I think it’s fair to say social media is destabilizing society. It’s far too easy for relatively small groups to affect public perception. That isn’t to say propaganda didn’t exist before, just that it’s a far more powerful tool than has ever existed in history

          How do you feel about the TikTok takeover?

          Obviously negatively, and I think it’s irrational for Americans to feel positively about it. For an average citizen, a foreign country controlling a platform like that should be a good thing. China can’t do anything to me. I don’t have to fear reprisal from China for speaking out against the government. I do have to worry about reprisal from the US

          Further, China has far fewer incentives to shape the opinions and discourse of Americans. Obviously they want to push a pro-China message, but that’s a relatively small sub-sect of American politics compared to the issues the US government would like to shape public opinion on

      • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        9 days ago

        Massive corporate social media companies and rightwing billionaires are the problem, not social media.

        Not sure if you’re trying to argue that modern social media is a good thing… Because it really isn’t.

        What are you doing here then?

        • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          Lemmy might fit within the technical definition of social media, but don’t be so obtuse as to equate an anonymous community message board with the likes of Facebook and IG that are tied to your identity, and are designed algorithmically to keep you engaged as long as possible while pressuring you to share more and more of your personal life.

          The “If social media bad, why on Lemmy?” Thing is the epitome of halfwit false equivalency.

          • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Lemmy might fit within the technical definition of social media, but don’t be so obtuse as to equate an anonymous community message board with the likes of Facebook and IG that are tied to your identity,

            Do you really think the state and its fascists care about this differentiation?

            They will literally come after Lemmy the first chance that they get. Far more so than insiders like zuck, musk, etc.

            And it will be at least partially a result of y’all libs calling for it based on this wacky pseudo-science.

          • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            9 days ago

            Lemmy might fit within the technical definition of social media, but don’t be so obtuse as to equate an anonymous community message board with the likes of Facebook and IG that are tied to your identity, and are designed algorithmically to keep you engaged as long as possible while pressuring you to share more and more of your personal life.

            then use your brain and analyze this deeper than social media = bad

            • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              20
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              9 days ago

              Nobody is interested in seriously engaging with your sophomoric “you criticize society yet you participate in it” nonsense. We get it, you’re 14 and think you’re deep.

              • supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 days ago

                Great and I am not interested in being subjected to a moral panic that feels like the logic was laid out by grifters trying to distract from their grift by manipulating gullible idiots to empower them even more.

                • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  100%. Haven’t these people been watching what happened to TikTok?

                  Or are they in denial because they were just as rabid about attacking TikTok?

              • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                8 days ago

                Y’all are literally calling for this website to be banned for the sake of pseudo-science.

                Lots of people are interested in this. Y’all are actively helping the worst.

                • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 days ago

                  Naw. I didn’t say anything about banning anything nor about any pseudo-science. No clue what you’re talking about

        • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          Who is downvoting this? jfc…

          People here are rabid about this “social media” but give a pass to literal fascism.

      • IronBird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        9 days ago

        news networks have been doing this same pretty much since they’ve existed

        • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          Humans have been killing each other as long as we’ve existed isn’t an argument to avoid trying to make it happen less

          • IronBird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 days ago

            just saying billionaires manipulating shit has been the norm for ages, which is why we used to have media-ownership limits…repealed under Clinton iirc

            • pipi1234@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              9 days ago

              Agreed, but now they have tools that enable them to do it with unprecedented impact.

              In my opinion, the difference is so huge, we might as well think they didn’t manipulate things at all before.

              • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 days ago

                Agreed, but now they have tools that enable them to do it with unprecedented impact.

                Yes tools like TikTok that libs lobbied to hand to fascists. Now they want more of the same.

            • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 days ago

              Yeah, by memory Rupert Murdoch had his hand at that and in Aus and the UK. I’d love to see that reined in again too

          • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Murder =/= social media.

            It’s pretty sad that I have to say this. People are really losing their minds of this “social media” hype.

    • Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 days ago

      nah… mark is clearly an international drug dealer and needs to have all his property seized, and then destroyed while he rots in prison.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      moral panic about social media in a way that is extremely unproductive, dangerous and ultimately a distraction from the actual issues at hand.

      100%. Yeah that’s the point. If there’s any alternative narrative, hegemony stirs up a panic then takes over control.

      Just look at what happened with TikTok. A bunch of obvious fascists started up a campaign. A bunch of liberals and other obvious fascists took it over… Now we have fash tiktok.

      The people foaming at the mouth in this comm want to do it all over again with every form of “social media”. It’s gonna be rich when they come for Lemmy.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 days ago

    Disable YT history. Make YT Subscriptions page your home page. Now all you see are the most recent videos from your subscribed channels. You can keep up with them without being distracted by garbage suggestions. It’s a much better experience.

  • Bosht@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 days ago

    Fucking GOOD. We need these useless companies to fail out and be held responsible for their actions.

  • lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 days ago

    That lawsuit documents the case of a 19-year-old, K.G.M, who hopes the jury will agree that Meta and YouTube caused psychological harm by designing features like infinite scroll and autoplay to push her down a path that she alleged triggered depression, anxiety, self-harm, and suicidality.

    What the hell is everyone watching? YT recommends me Red Letter Media, Veratasium, old movies, Blender tutorials and a bunch of other stuff that’s never going to drive me to self-harm. I don’t understand. May be this woman doesn’t have ad blocker installed and is forced to sit through a bunch of soul crushing PSAs? Why is my experience so drastically different from this?

    • architect@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      Truth is these people watch garbage and the algo delivers… garbage.

      I’m not trying to victim blame but, i mean… not my YouTube either (but I’ve seen the front pages of some…stupid people too say it nicely).

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Watching those hack frauds causes psychological harm. Rich Evans is known to trigger depression

    • thax@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Sounds like you consume useful information. I wager she uses socials as many: to compare herself to others, perusing a mix of ego-affirming and ego-damning content. These are powerful emotional hooks and oscillating between those states can be confounding. Add a dash of fatalism, which is not hard to come by in this culture, when at a low, and I think it easy to see how one might capitulate.

      There are a lot of people out there that think their personality traits are inherent and that their physical attributes are static. In fact, my brother was one of these people, to an extent. He passed away at 40 years old due to morbid obesity. I attribute his downfall to capitulation by way of comparison. He came to think the hole was too big and that his genetics were too poor to make changes, despite me providing an example to the contrary. Sadly, my parents fanned the flames of his dissonance with their own identity-bound delusions.

      So, my guess is that you have developed a healthy personal philosophy and have not surrounded yourself with the type of people or digital content that renders that philosophy dissonant.

  • vogo13@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Facebook helped to cause Arab Spring. These platforms are responsible for the destruction of civilization under the guise of “connecting everyone”.

    • ranzispa@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I wouldn’t use Arab springs as an example of why Facebook is not a good product. Facebook has many problems and misuses, but I would not list allowing people to organise as one of them.

    • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 days ago

      These platforms are responsible for the destruction of civilization under the guise of “connecting everyone”.

      CA discovered how to “hack” people’s minds, then maybe the Russians and Chinese figured it out, and the oligarchy and the lunatic fringe want all in to brainwash the world.

      Makes me angry knowing that at anytime a bigger war could break out.

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        at anytime a bigger war could break out.

        Welcome back to the late 1970s / early 1980s I grew up in.

        We just learned to live with it- maybe move to a big city for a better chance at instant vaporization.

        Meanwhile in 1984: When Doves Cry you might as well Jump, and when the 99 Red Balloons Float by you’ll be sitting pretty in this dust that was a city.

        • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          The 80s were anxiety inducing because the specter of war was then high until the Soviet Union collapsed on itself, so throughout the 90s and the naughts a nuke war wasn’t going to happen even with North Korea trying to rattle sabers.

          Instead and beginning last year we now have madmen on hair triggers, and if it’s not a third world war, then a prospect of another American civil war where there’s a high potential of causing a global economic catastrophe.

          • MangoCats@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            The 90s and the naughts were actually a pretty good time… we did too little to ensure that continued, in so so many ways.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 days ago

        As far as I can tell, advertisement/profit-driven social media that is directly tied to your real identity might actually be the worst thing humanity has ever invented.

        Oops!

        Turns out we’re mostly vain and stupid, in our default state.

        Now amplify.

        Oh and as a bonus:

        It serves as a kind of self perpetuating auto-panopticon.

        It never ceases to amaze me how many people just record thems committing, planning to commit, bragging about committing, or admitting to commiting crimes that can put you away for 5 years plus… on fucking TikTok.

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Hey wow its like I’ve been saying that for a decade, but because I’m poor and I say that, clearly I am some kind of antisocial insane person, not somebody who can read a bunch of existing studies and data and form a conclusion.

    Corporation would never gaslight you!

    … unless you deserved it.

  • Affidavit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    8 days ago

    What a bunch of nonsensical slop.

    Can we please hate billionaires without being absolute nincompoops?

    Please? You people are really making us look like fucking idiots.

      • Affidavit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 days ago

        Lemmy

        As in, I’ve had enough of this crap. The name is apt. What a bunch of fucking Lemmings.

        Reddit sucks. Lemmy is no better.

        Reckon I’ll just go without.

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    IG is 100% not a drug.

    And those of y’all who are promoting this pseudo-science are part of the problem. Look at what y’all did to TikTok. Wacky liberal lemmings handing the internet over to literal fascists.

    Literally nobody mentioning what happened to TikTok after that sinophobic pogram. Peeps are just excited for round 2.

    https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/1/29/palestinian-journalist-bisan-owda-with-1-4m-followers-reports-tiktok-ban